Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Shocked and disappointed' - Irish club furious over unexplained snub

; Munster players run to their supporters after the Vodafone Womens Interprovincial Championship Round 3 match between Leinster and Munster (Photo By Harry Murphy/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

An Irish rugby club have said they are ‘shocked’ after a motion to grant Women’s AIL clubs senior status was withdrawn at Munster’s AGM last night.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ballincollig RFC said the motion was ‘withdrawn without notice’ and that they are seeking an urgent meeting with Munster Rugby over the decision. The motion would have brought the province in line with Leinster, Connacht and Ulster policies on the matter.

The decision comes in the context of a turbulent six months for women’s rugby in Ireland, where accusations were levelled against the IRFU over the treatment of the women’s game, accusations that contributed to two independent reviews and ultimately an apology from the IRFU last month.

Video Spacer

RFU Belonging – Back in the Game

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 0:52
Loaded: 18.93%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 0:52
 
1x
    • Chapters
    • descriptions off, selected
    • captions off, selected
    • en (Main), selected
    Video Spacer

    RFU Belonging – Back in the Game

    Respected Irish Independent journalist Ruaidhri O’Connor tweeted that: “At the 11th hour tonight (Thursday), the Munster Branch withdrew the motion to recognise women’s AIL clubs and players as senior from its AGM agenda. Suggestion is it wasn’t going to pass. Leinster, Connacht and Ulster all recognise Women’s AIL clubs and players as senior.”

    Ballincollig said in a statement today that it was “shocked and disappointed that, after 12 months in the works, the motion to grant Women’s AIL clubs senior status was withdrawn without notice or explanation before the Munster Branch AGM last night”.

    “We will be seeking an urgent meeting with Munster Rugby and the IRFU to see what steps can be taken to rectify this and to bring our province in line with others who recognise their Women’s AIL clubs as senior.”

    “In what has been a turbulent period for the Women’s game it is disappointing that equality is still something that needs to be fought for and that not all Munster rugby players are considered equal.”

    ADVERTISEMENT

    One current Ballincollig player, Thérèse Ahern, posted: “On behalf of the let down, demoralised, yet still committed squad of players I’ve spoken to this morning, some of whom aren’t on Twitter and others worried about putting future red and green jerseys in jeopardy, I ask Munster Rugby, Jack Chambers and the IRFU, why not me?”

    Ireland international Cliodhna Moloney commented: “Misogyny alive and well in Munster. May ye be dragged by the eyelids through a pile of steaming s***e and into the 21st century. Amen.”

    Founder of Scrumqueens Ali Donnelly described it as ’embarrassing and frustrating but for me personally a great reminder why I give up a load (aka all) of my free time to advocate for and campaign for women’s rugby and fairness across the sport. And memo to those clubs blocking progress – this won’t hold.”

    ADVERTISEMENT

    KOKO Show | July 22nd | Full Throttle with Brisbane Test Review and Melbourne Preview

    New Zealand v South Africa | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

    USA vs England | Men's International | Full Match Replay

    France v Argentina | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

    Lions Share | Episode 4

    Zimbabwe vs Namibia | Rugby Africa Cup Final | Full Match Replay

    USA vs Fiji | Women's International | Full Match Replay

    Tattoos & Rugby: Why are tattoos so popular with sportspeople? | Amber Schonert | Rugby Rising Locker Room Season 2

    Trending on RugbyPass

    Comments

    0 Comments
    Be the first to comment...

    Join free and tell us what you really think!

    Sign up for free
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Latest Features

    Comments on RugbyPass

    N
    NH 25 minutes ago
    'The Wallabies need to convert much better - or Melbourne could be much worse'

    Nice one as always Brett. I think the stats hide a bit of the dominance the lions had, and they would look alot worse in that first half when the game was more in the balance. You mention it here but I think it hasn’t been talked about enough was the lineout. The few times the wallabies managed to exit their half and get an opportunity to attack in the 1st half, the lineout was lost. This was huge in terms of lions keeping momentum and getting another chance to attack, rather than the wallabies getting their chance and to properly ‘exit’ their half. The other one you touch on re “the will jordan bounce of the ball” - is kick chase/receipt. I thought that the wallabies kicked relatively well (although were beaten in this area - Tom L rubbish penalty kicks for touch!), but our kick receipt and chase wasn’t good enough jorgenson try aside. In the 1st half there was a moment where russell kicked for a 50:22 and potter fumbled it into touch after been caught out of position, lynagh makes a similar kick off 1st phase soon after and keenan is good enough to predict the kick, catch it at his bootlaces and put a kick in. That kick happened to go out on the full but it was a demonstration on the difference in positioning etc. This meant that almost every contested kick that was spilled went the way of the lions, thats no accident, that is a better chase, more urgency, more players in the area. Wallabies need to be better in who fields their kicks getting maxy and wright under most of them and Lynagh under less, and the chase needs to be the responsibility of not just one winger but a whole group of players who pressure not just the catch but the tackle, ruck and following phase.

    17 Go to comments
    J
    JW 41 minutes ago
    Competing interests and rotated squads: What the 'player welfare summer' is really telling us

    Thanks for the further background to player welfare metrics Nick.


    Back on the last article I noted that WR is now dedicating a whole section in their six-point business plan to this topic. It also noted that studies indicated 85-90% of workload falls outside of playing. So in respect to your point on the classification of ‘involvements’ included even subs with a low volume of minutes, it actually goes further, to the wider group of players that train as if they’re going to be required to start on the weekend, even if they’re outside the 23. That makes even the 30-35 game borderline pale into insignificance.


    No doubt it is won of the main reasons why France has a quota on the number of one clubs players in their International camps, and rotate in other clubs players through the week. The number of ‘invisible’ games against a player suggests the FFRs 25 game limit as more appropriate?


    So if we take it at face value that Galthie and the FFR have got it right, only a dozen players from the last 60 international caps should have gone on this tour. More players from the ‘Scotland 23’ than the more recent 23.


    The only real pertinent question is what do players prefer more, health or money? There are lots of ethical decisions, like for instance whether France could make a market like Australia’s where their biggest rugby codes have yearly broadcast deals of 360 and 225 million euros. They do it by having a 7/8 month season.

    68 Go to comments
    LONG READ
    LONG READ Competing interests and rotated squads: What the 'player welfare summer' is really telling us Competing interests and rotated squads: What the 'player welfare summer' is really telling us