Slam-chasing Jones makes plea to World Rugby ahead of Thursday's World League summit
International Rugby Players has committed to Thursday’s global competition discussions in order to explore options and see if a constructive solution for the game can be found.
However, the global player’s body will be reinforcing that player views must be fundamental to any future proposals.
It follows a conference call meeting of the Players Council on Tuesday, which took place two weeks after the group highlighted serious player welfare and integrity concerns around World Rugby’s proposed global competition structure.
Former British and Irish Lions captain Brian O’Driscoll said:“This is a pivotal moment for everyone in our sport. The players have made their views clear on the proposed global competition but at the same time, they want to work with World Rugby, unions, provinces and clubs to genuinely explore what may be possible.”
The International Rugby Players Council is also calling on the governing body and its member unions to enter meaningful negotiations on how to best work together in future, citing that decisions are too often reached without any opportunity for players to positively influence the outcome.
(Continue reading below...)
Wales captain Alun Wyn Jones said: “We want to ensure that there will be no repeat of the current situation and that the frustrations over the lack of player consultation are addressed.
“It's in the interest of our game that World Rugby and the unions convene with the playing population so that proper solutions can be agreed. Players having a genuine, and greater say, can’t be undervalued.”
Australian Player Council member Michael Hooper said: “We want to be part of key decisions in the game. However at the moment we don’t have a proper seat at the table to exert any influence.
"Players understand, better than anyone, what happens at the coal face and how certain decisions impact both the players and the broader game, so it would be counter-productive to cast the player view aside.
"Moving forward we want to ensure that the players have independently appointed representation on the World Rugby Executive Committee and other key World Rugby decision making bodies.”
Former South African captain Jean de Villiers added: “The players feel that the existing understanding between World Rugby and the Players should evolve from a loose commitment to consult to a requirement to reach agreement on certain key issues.
"The feeling on the call was that it is no longer appropriate for World Rugby and the unions to determine tournament structures, logistics and tournament terms of participation without getting to an agreed outcome with players.”
The group also reiterated that while the men’s 15s game is in focus at the moment, meaningful representation of players needs to extend to all discussions across men’s, women’s, 15s and Sevens.
Australian Sevens captain Shannon Parry said: “It’s great to see solidarity among players and a shared sense that we need be integral to major decisions. As a senior women’s international, I want to see our athletes at the forefront of all discussions into the future and to be part of the growth of the game.”
Latest Comments
Agree with Wilson B- at best. And that is down to skilled individual players who know how to play the game - not a cohesive squad who know their roles and game plan. For those who claim that takes time to develop, the process is to keep the game plan simple at first and add layers as the squad gels and settles in to the new systems. Lack of progress against the rush D, lack of penetration and innovation in the mid-field, basic skill errors and loose forwards coming second in most big games all still evident in game 14 of the season. Hard to see significant measureable progress.
Go to commentsKeep telling yourself that. The time for a fresh broom is at the beginning - not some "balanced, incremental" (i.e. status quo) transition. All teams establish the way forward at the beginning. This coaching group lacked ideas and courage and the players showed it on the pitch. Backs are only average. Forwards are unbalanced and show good set piece but no domination in traditional AB open play. Unfortunately, Foster - Mark 2. You may be happy with those performances and have some belief in some "cunning plan" but I don't see any evidence of it. Rassie is miles ahead and increasing the gap.
Go to comments