1
'Full petulant child' - Costly Joe Marler brainfade enrages fans
By Ian Cameron
Harlequins prop Joe Marler has drawn sharp criticism following his side's Investec Champions Cup loss to Toulouse after conceding a needless penalty late in the game.
The veteran prop - who was sprung from the replacements bench late in the contest - was penalized for clouting Toulouse substitute Thomas Ramos around the head in the 77th minute, granting the home team a penalty as the contest neared its conclusion.
With the 33-year-old no stranger to such antics, patience seems to have worn thin even among Quins fans. Indeed the incident drew a plenty of annoyance on social media - much of which came from the English club's fans who were infuriated at the Marler's latest act of tomfoolery.
Fans and pundits alike slammed Marler for what was seen as a needless lapse in judgment and Twitter duly lit up with reactions. One user branded Marler "forever being a d***head" while another described the infraction as "the sort of thing you'd be pissed off at your mate in a 2xv game."
Such a stupid penalty to concede.
Joe Marler. 🤦♂️ pic.twitter.com/Bwtyy5Mhnb— Jared Wright (@jaredwright17) May 5, 2024
Yet another fan wrote: "Joe Marler going full petulant child in the final minutes. Amazes me when professionals are that stupid", while another observed: "I like Joe Marler as a bloke, but I never want him to play for any team I support. What was he thinking there?"
There were many more in that vein.
Another fan defended Marler, writing: "Quins were never going to win this game at that point anyway. But I hope I don't see Joe Marler getting abused after that. He's not the only player to have ever done something petty like that."
Leinster fan account Harpin on Rugby - possibly hoping Quins and not Toulouse made it through to the final with the Irish province - chimed in a with an apposite GIF.
Until that point Harlequins had fought valiantly in their semi-final clash, overcoming a 31-12 deficit to come within striking distance before ultimately succumbing to Toulouse.
The Gallagher Premiership side struck via tries from Marcus Smith, Cadan Murley, Will Evans and Tyrone Green. Toulouse won the day however through scores by Antoine Dupont, Matthis Lebel, Peato Mauvaka and Thibaud Flament.
Toulouse’s resilience shone through when winger Juan Cruz Mallia crossed the line in the 69th minute, effectively ending Harlequins' hopes of a comeback. Quins had plenty of moments, notably closing the gap to within five points after an hour, but it wasn't enough.
In the final minutes Marler's error stood out as a significant setback but it probably didn't change the course of the game. Thge home side also capitalized on Jack Walker's yellow card and while Marler’s penalty was not solely responsible for the defeat, the timing of his error didn't help matters.
Trending on RugbyPass
2
Sale Sharks refuse to give up on new stadium dream
3
French reports rule Michael Cheika out of Racing job
4
Duhan van der Merwe injury update leaves Andy Farrell with a dilemma
5
Latest Comments
Soccer on a rugby forum…
“Experience is strongly correlated with age, at least among the managers that I named”…
Slot and Arteta are among the youngest you named. They have the least experience as a manager (6 years each). Espírito Santo and Pep are the oldest and have the most (12 years + each). Pep is pushing 17 years experience, all at elite level. There are plenty around his age that won’t have the same level of experience. Plenty.
The younger breed you mentioned (Arteta in particular) may not coach at elite level beyond the next few years if they continue to not win trophies. Age and experience is not always a nice, steady gradient.
The only trend in English soccer is that managers don’t stay on as long with the same club. Due to the nature of the game and the assumed, immediate performance bounce of replacing them at the first sign of trouble. Knee-jerk style. Test rugby has no clear pattern of that.
Why would you dismiss a paradox? Contradictions are often revealing. Or is that too incoherent?
Go to commentsYou can’t compare the “quality”of competitions till they play against each other … what we do know is that nz teams filled with ABs and ABs can go at it with anyone in the world and these other teams and players are competing so would say the quality is high wouldn’t you? How are you determining that URC or top 14 is higher quality than Super I’m guessing you mean in the quality of players and execution ? Are you just assuming that it is because…. I would say it’s much of a muchness and the only indicator for that is international rugby and that is hella even
Go to comments