1
South Africa main perpetrator in axing financially unsustainable Sunwolves - report
By Online Editors
South Africa are believed to be the main country in the SANZAAR association pushing for the removal of the Japanese based Sunwolves, reports The Daily Telegraph.
It is expected that SANZAAR will announce on Friday that the Sunwolves will be removed from Super Rugby only three years after their inclusion. As part of more revamping, Super Rugby will abolish the conference system and return to a round-robin format where everyone plays each other once.
The pressure from the South African union was ultimately too much, as they reportedly threatened financial penalties to Rugby Australia and New Zealand Rugby. The South African teams have been vocal about their displeasure in travelling to Singapore and Japan to play the Sunwolves in the past.
All of the teams have been financially supporting the Sunwolves to prop up the team in the hope that the franchise would lure investment from the Asian market. The end goal was to obtain funding from Japanese companies to become independently sustainable but that has not happened after three seasons.
Australia and New Zealand were keen to persist with the team as part of long-term growth into Asia for the Super Rugby competition, but the South Africans were opposed.
Concerns abate over what kind of team the Sunwolves will field in 2020, the last season under the current broadcast deal.
With the Japanese Top League running two editions in the calendar year, the 2019/20 season will overlap with Super Rugby in 2020 meaning many top Japanese players will be unavailable. The Sunwolves will have to field its players from available ex-pat rejects from other countries.
This could lead to a disastrous final season for the Sunwolves who have finally found some notion of competitiveness in 2019. The axing of the Japan franchise on the eve of the Rugby World Cup in Japan is also a bad look for SANZAAR.
The rapid expansion of the Super Rugby competition has almost completely come undone, with the competition set to field 14-teams again. This will mean less games for players but also potentially less broadcast revenue for unions.
The Bulls ahead of Chiefs clash:
Trending on RugbyPass
2
'Chaos': Lawes sheds light on the social that ended 2 England careers
3
Ex-Ireland wing brands Six Nations champs 'not that good'
4
Hacjivah Dayimani exits SA following Springbok snub
5
Latest Comments
Not sure the Bulls need another average utility back in their ranks. Chamberlain has been ok for the Sharks but is by no means an X-Factor player. Bulls bought several utility backs which they barely use. A typical example would be Henry Immelman who plays mostly Fullback. The Bulls however have rarely played him this year and he has played wing or centre. Bulls want to build depth but seems like they have too many surplus players
Go to commentsABs lost against a side playing without a hooker - The guy playing, had one shoulder. Line outs were a gimme for the ABs, and the last 8 minutes 14 played 14 against a team that had been smashed 3 weeks in a row… Yet with all that possession, with all that territory, with all the advantages they actually had, especially in the last 8 minutes, they couldn’t buy a point. Those last 8 minutes determined if they outplayed the Boks or not. History will show that the Boks completely outplayed the ABs, especially in those last 8 minutes, the business end of any rugby match
Go to comments