Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Springboks can still 'dominate' Ireland in one facet of game

Tadhg Furlong of Ireland is tackled by Eben Etzebeth of South Africa during the Guinness Series International match between Ireland and South Africa at the Aviva Stadium in Dublin. (Photo By Eóin Noonan/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

Former South Africa head coach Nick Mallett believes that the Springboks still have it in their wheel house to beat Ireland at the Rugby World Cup.

ADVERTISEMENT

Despite the Six Nations champions Ireland being the most consistent team in world rugby for the last 10 months or so and are currently ranked No.1, Mallett remains confident about South Africa’s chances.

The Boks will be facing Ireland and Scotland in Pool B of the World Cup in six months’ time, and may also potentially face the hosts France in the quarter-finals.

Mallett shared his views on the performances of the three countries in the 2023 Six Nations in his Sport24 column. He expressed his belief that South Africa still has “the team to match and beat any side” that played in the competition.

“On a results basis and given who they have beaten over the last 18 months, Ireland are rightly the best side in the world presently,” he writes.

“Even so, the one big area where the Springboks dominate Ireland is in the tight five, particularly in the front row. If the Boks play a game where they can win the battle of the scrum penalties, they will be in a good position because their first-string front row is better than Ireland’s.

“The one significant danger of the Irish side is their ability to vary their game. They don’t just thrive off driving maul; they have many attacking options off their lineout, making them very difficult to play against.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The Springboks, however, have a contesting lineout that is very competitive and, off their own ball, the Boks have a driving maul that is incredibly difficult to stop with the forwards they have. If anyone can beat Ireland, South Africa can.”

South Africa has a historical dominance over Ireland in rugby union, having won 19 out of their 27 matches against each other.

ADVERTISEMENT

Toshiba Brave Lupus Tokyo vs Kubota Spears | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 Final | Full Match Replay

Saitama Wild Knights vs Kobe Steelers | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 Bronze Final | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 42 | Investec Champions Cup Final Review

Spain's Incredible Rugby Sevens Journey to the World Championship Final | HSBC SVNS Embedded | Episode 14

Australia vs USA | Pacific Four Series 2025 | Full Match Replay

New Zealand vs Canada | Pacific Four Series 2025 | Full Match Replay

South Africa vs New Zealand | The Rugby Championship U20's | Full Match Replay

The Game that Made Jonah Lomu

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
R
Richard 804 days ago

Have to say when the Boks play Ireland at the RWC2023 I would fancy their chances ... but as Mallet says the Irish team have many facets to their game.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tommy B. 42 minutes ago
Rassie Erasmus wades into heated debate over Jaden Hendrikse antics

🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂

I’ll go with one more because it’s so funny but then I must stop. There’s only so long you can talk to the nutter on the bus.

There is no legal impediment in the GFA to ANY form of border. It’s mentioned very briefly and ambiguously but even then there’s a caveat ‘if the security situation permits’ which is decided by the British government as the border is an internationally, UN recognised formal border between sovereign states. Now, you can argue that this is because it was assumed it would always be in the EU context - but we all know the issue with ‘assumption’. As to your hilarious drivel about what you think is in the GFA, you clearly haven’t read it or at best not understood it. There are still 1,580 British Army troops in NI. The legal status of NI as part of the UK is unchanged.

So, there was a problem for those that wanted to use the border to complicate any future British government changing regulations and trade arrangements through domestic legislation. Hence ‘hard border’ became ANYTHING that wasn’t a totally open border.

This allowed the EU and their fanatical Remainer British counterparts to imply that any form of administration AT the border was a ‘hard border.’ Soldiers with machine guns? Hard border. Old bloke with clipboard checking the load of every 200th lorry? Hard border. Anything in between? Hard Border. They could then use Gerry’s implicit threats to any ‘border officials’ to ensure that there would be an unique arrangement so that if any future parliament tried to change trade or administrative regulations for any part of the UK (which the EU was very worried about) some fanatical Remainer MP could stand up and say - ‘this complicates the situation in NI.’

You’ve just had a free lesson in the complex politics that went WAY over your head at the time. You’re welcome.

Now, I must slowly back out of the room, and bid you good day, as you’re clearly a nutter.

584 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING All Blacks trio return for Crusaders' Qualifying Final against Reds All Blacks trio return for Crusaders' playoff push
Search