1
Suaalii not a 15 in rugby union says Wallaby great
By Ian Cameron
One of the Wallabies' all-time great fullbacks doesn't think code-hopping sensation Joseph Suaalii should play 15 when he switches back to rugby union in 2024.
Suaalii put in a romper performance for the Sydney Roosters just days after his multi-million dollar rugby union deal was struck, helping his team to a 28-20 win over Parramatta having slotted in at fullback for a concussed James Tedesco.
Yet Matt Burke doesn't believe the controversial star should play in the 15-man game's equivalent position.
“All the talk is fullback in rugby league, and he did well on Thursday night when Teddy [James Tedesco] went off,” Burke said this week. “People are straight away saying he should play fullback in rugby union, but I don’t think so."
Burke won 81 caps for the Wallabies at fullback during the comparative golden era of the 1990s and early noughties but doesn't think the youngster would see enough ball in his old position.
"I reckon he would be a massive body at 13, a good runner of the ball with a good step. He would get his hands on the ball there, more so, and complement the people who are around him.”
Burke might see Suaalii as a Wallabies version of Sonny Bill Williams, but it's another, even more, controversial code-hopper where similarities are eerily similar.
It's hard to look at the 19-year-old and not see a young Israel Folau - at least in an on-field sense.
Both stand 6'5 and are powerfully built but athletic ball players who are equally happy in the air fielding high kicks as they are bringing the ball to the line.
Both share an offloading ability and an aerial prowess and have proven themselves to be prolific try-scorers, whichever code they're playing. The duo are also known for their ability to create opportunities for their teammates.
Suallii, like Folau, can play in multiple positions, so there's little doubt he could make a go of any position from 11 to 15. Unlike Folau, Suaalii has the benefit of having played union as a standout schoolboy talent.
While Folau's relationship with Rugby Australia soured in the worst way imaginable, there's no denying that he made an immediate impact in the game back in 2013, a feat that eludes the majority of rugby league crossovers.
Australian rugby will be hoping that lightning strikes twice with their $4.8 million dollar Suaalii gamble.
Trending on RugbyPass
2
Rassie Erasmus explains so-called Willie Le Roux selection snub
3
Mitchell hints England's much-maligned habit is a thing of the past
4
Gregor Townsend breaks silence on his Scotland future
5
Latest Comments
I’ve seen an improvement in both.
Go to commentsFrance using the 7-1, England using the 6-2, Ireland and Scotland have used it a few times as well and many nations are starting to adopt it. The reality is the game is changing. Administrators have made it faster and that is leading to more significant drop offs in the forwards. You have 2 options. Load your bench with forwards or alter your player conditioning which might mean more intense conditioning for forwards and a drop off in bulk. The game can still be played many ways. Every nation needs to adapt in their own way to suit their strengths. France have followed the Springbok model of tight forwards being preferred because it suits them. They have huge hunks of meat and the bench is as good as the starters so why not go for it? The Springboks have also used hybrids like Kwagga Smith, Schalk Britz, Deon Fourie, Franco Mostert and others. England are following that model instead and by putting 3 loosies there who can do damage in defence and make the breakdown a mess in the final quarter. It worked well against Wales but will be interested to see how it goes going forward against better opposition who can threaten their lineout and scrum. All the talk around bench limitations to stop the 7-1 and 6-2 for me is nonsense. Coaches who refuse to innovate want to keep the game the same and make it uniform and sameness is bad for fans. The bench composition adds jeopardy and is a huge debate point for fans who love it. Bench innovations have not made the game worse, they have made it better and more watchable. They challenge coaches and teams and that’s what fans want. What we need now is more coaches to innovate. There is still space for the 5-3 or even a 4-4 if a coach is willing to take it on and play expansive high tempo possession-based rugby with forwards who are lean and mean and backs who are good over the ball. The laws favour that style more than ever before. Ireland are too old to do it now. Every team needs to innovate to best suit their style and players so I hope coaches and pundits stop moaning about forwards and benches and start to find different ways to win.
Go to comments