Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'That is why the football one has created a bit of a furore': Exeter wade into Super League debate and its relevance for rugby

(Photo by Getty Images)

Exeter boss Rob Baxter has given his take on the hop topic that is dominating the sports headlines in England this week, the plan to create a breakaway European Super League that will contain six English football clubs whose long-term participation would be guaranteed as there would be no relegation.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ring-fencing is something close to the heart of Baxter because if the top-flight in English rugby was a closed shop, Exeter would never have made the ascent for the first time in 2010 and gone on since then to twice win the Premiership title along with becoming last year’s European champions.

Exeter travel to Bristol this Friday, a club that has had its experiences of relegation in recent times and who would have been excluded from the Premiership if the door was shut on them while they were in the second tier.

Video Spacer

Kurtley Beale guests on the latest RugbyPass Offload with Simon Zebo and Ryan Wilson

Video Spacer

Kurtley Beale guests on the latest RugbyPass Offload with Simon Zebo and Ryan Wilson

Instead, Ashton Gate will play host to the table-topping Bears taking on the second-place Chiefs, clubs whose emergence as powerhouses in the English game wasn’t foreseen five years ago and a head-to-head like this would be unable to happen if rugby had adopted the proposed European Super League format of no promotion/relegation.

“In this country, you would always say it [promotion and relegation] is very important, it has always been part of pretty much every sport in this country that there is a way of working yourself through results on the field up through the leagues. It’s massive in this country,” said Baxter at his weekly Exeter media briefing.

“But if you say is it the be-all and end-all of competitive sport you would have to say no because in America virtually you never see relegation in any of their top professional sports. It’s not as simple as saying is it the be-all and end-all or the most important part of sport because clearly it’s not.

“But at the same time it is part of British sport and one that I have said many times from a personal perspective I feel very uncomfortable about because I know what we had to go through, not just one season to get promoted to the top league but how we had to work our way through the league structure over a number of seasons. I know everyone in Exeter is in favour of some form of promotion and relegation to remain in the game.

ADVERTISEMENT

I don’t know how much crossover there is (between football and rugby) if I am honest with you. In reality, there is such a different scenario happening at the moment in football Manchester United, for example, are owned by American people whose only experience of sport outside of United would have been in a closed shop franchise system, no promotion, no relegation.

“For them, the whole scenario is completely different to how we would look at it at Exeter as a members club that has been promoted through a league structure and the sums of money that are being talked about are sums of money that if you have bought a Premiership football club as a business proposition and that is your first and foremost reason for running that business, not any link with football or any link with the country you are involved in.

“Then you can see how your focus is going to be on where do you get the biggest TV deal, how do you increase your revenue to the maximum level and I just think you can’t tie all sports up into one framework and think one thing suits all. I don’t think that is possible.

Asked if there had even been rumblings in rugby along the lines of what is proposed by football’s European Super League, Exeter boss Baxter continued: “There have always been little bits and pieces happening in the background over a number of years.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I can remember maybe hearing rumours about it six, seven years ago but it is a different prospect in rugby in a lot of ways… because we have got a pretty well formulated Heineken Cup and Challenge Cup that is quite a number of games.

“Personally, would it work? Any competition would work if it is formatted correctly and it has got everyone’s support. At the end of the day if supporters and TV companies want to watch it pretty much any competition tends to work. The ones that are still in place are the ones that people want to watch on TV or by going into the games.

“Any format is possible depending on what people want to watch. Is it right or wrong? Again, I don’t think it is for any one person to say. Most structures have been put in place because they have broken away from a different league structure before, haven’t they? Which one is right and which one is wrong is very difficult to say.

“A lot of the time it’s probably not for the incumbents to talk about. You look at ourselves: it’s a very weird thing for me to be asked questions about a potential European Super League in rugby. Maybe we would be involved because we have been towards the top end of the Premiership now for a few years but before we got to the Premiership it was only the founding clubs in the Premiership that even had a share of Premiership Rugby.

“Ten, eleven years ago we wouldn’t have even been a shareholder so we would have had no hope with it because we didn’t have a share in Premiership Rugby so no one was going to invite us into a European competition,” continued Baxter, highlighting the extent of the Exeter evolution this past decade. “Since then we have become a shareholder and now we might get asked into it. It’s all about timing and where you are and where you end up at what time.

“That is why the football one has created a bit of a furore because there is an element about it that doesn’t feel right. That is the bigger issue. It just doesn’t feel right that you can talk about a European Super League with teams that within their current league structure you wouldn’t deem as being super clubs based on results. Everyone feels uncomfortable with it in any scenario when it’s not results-driven, it’s history driven and it feels odd because our history would say we should not be anywhere near it.

“As people have said, the Premier League is in effect a breakaway league from where it was. Is Premiership Rugby a breakaway league from what it was and effectively it is, it’s a group of shareholder clubs now working within the RFU structure.

“I don’t know if it is okay for any one person to make the call on what is right or wrong. As I said, ultimately what gets proved right or wrong is the structures that stay in place are successful. It’s difficult to try and put a moral value on things because you can be as moral as you like but you have still got to be able to afford for the competition to take place. The reality is those drivers will always be there and they will be a huge part in any decision that gets made.”

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Toshiba Brave Lupus Tokyo vs Kubota Spears | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 Final | Full Match Replay

Saitama Wild Knights vs Kobe Steelers | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 Bronze Final | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 42 | Investec Champions Cup Final Review

Spain's Incredible Rugby Sevens Journey to the World Championship Final | HSBC SVNS Embedded | Episode 14

Australia vs USA | Pacific Four Series 2025 | Full Match Replay

New Zealand vs Canada | Pacific Four Series 2025 | Full Match Replay

South Africa vs New Zealand | The Rugby Championship U20's | Full Match Replay

The Game that Made Jonah Lomu

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
Spew_81 1 hour ago
Broken hand or not, Richie Mo'unga is still New Zealand's best 10

His family was financially secure before future in going to Japan. Now they will only have to work if they feel like it :)


It’s not like the amateur era, he would made about four million staying in New Zealand in the 2024-2027 cycle. He ultimately chose a few million extra going to Japan. Easy to understand if was still going to get the cold shoulder from the coaches. But Roberston poised to make Mo’unga the corner stone. It was Mo’unga’s chance to end the debate as to who was the best 10 in New Zealand.


Yes, it’s possible to get a career ending injury at any time playing rugby. But that doesn’t often happen. Even most really bad injuries only take one season to recover from (yes there are outliers, but that’s rare). Even if he lost a season, he would still bring home four million.


He could’ve been the difference between an All Black team that is second (probably lucky to be second) and an All Black team that is number one. Also, the current high earners only can earn highly because the New Zealand rugby system made them as good as they are. Beneficiaries of that system should look to give back to the system and to the fans. Yes, it’s a risk for the individual, but it’s a risk many took before him. New Zealand rugby is a fragile thing. The NZRU can barely make money most years. The sponsors won’t pay the same for a mid-ranked team as they will for team that is number one.


We’ve discussed this before and I know you see it the other way :)

44 Go to comments
S
Spew_81 1 hour ago
Broken hand or not, Richie Mo'unga is still New Zealand's best 10

The coaches who like those ideas ( e.g. non specialist/positionless/play what’s in front of you rugby) are often successful innovators e.g. Hansen, W Smith, E Jones etc.


I think they get it in their head that they have to be constantly innovating to stay on top. Sometimes the best thing is just to focus on the basics/current pattern.


To a degree I think that that type of coach gets bored - unless they are trying to break the mold. But also, their success to that point and personality type won’t allow them to drop the new idea and admit they were wrong.


Much like when the All Blacks were going to have a ‘flat backline’ in the Henry era. They were adamant that it was going to work, eventually. They were prepared to lose a few tests to achieve it. After the 2009 season (losing 0-3 to the Springboks) they were more than willing to give up 20 meters to offset the 'rush defense’. They generally go that 20 meters back and more on top. It was to Henry’s credit be changed how the backline worked e.g. abandoned the ‘flat backline’ and dropped the power wings for three fullback/right wings.


With the benefit of 20/20 hindsight: a Cruden(10)/B Barrett(15) combo might’ve been better for the 2016-2019 cycle; and a Mo’unga(10)/B Barrett(15) combo might’ve been better for the 2016-2019 cycle. Then maybe Mo’unga(10)/Jordan (15) [with McKenzie at reserve 9] for the 2020-2023 cycle.


I went off the deep end a bit the end of the comment, see who reads that far down :)

44 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Wallace Sititi drops to bench, Quinn Tupaea ruled out for Chiefs Wallace Sititi drops to bench for Chiefs vs Blues
Search