The 15 England players yet to play a single minute in this Six Nations
Steve Borthwick’s latest squad of 36 have assembled in the north of England for a fallow week training camp that will culminate in an open session in York on Friday.
The question on the minds of English fans will be what the head coach can do to quickly improve his team for their round four Guinness Six Nations clash with the title-chasing Ireland on March 9.
Having named the same side to take on Wales in round two following the opening round win in Italy, the first time England had gone with an unchanged XV since the 2019 Rugby World Cup final, there were five changes to the starting line-up that crumbled in Scotland last Saturday.
While England finished the recent World Cup in France as the bronze medal winners, they came through the weaker side of the draw and their status in recent years as a second-rate Six Nations team was reinforced by their horrible capitulation at Scottish Gas Murrayfield.
Since winning the 2020 pandemic-affected championship, England’s results in the Six Nations have been underwhelming.
All three completed campaigns ended with just two wins from five matches and with Ireland and France still to play in 2024, they are facing that very same depressing outcome – another two-from-five season unless they can manage an upset against the Irish or the French.
So far this year, Borthwick has had 43 players attend England training. Twenty have gone on to be starters (10 started in all three February matches), with eight more appearing off the bench at some stage in the games against the Italians, the Welsh and the Scots.
That leaves 15 players – eight forwards and seven backs – who have trained with England at some stage in recent weeks without seeing a single minute of action in this year’s championship.
Tighthead Joe Heyes, hookers Luke Cowan-Dickie and Jamie Blamire, locks Nick Isiekwe and Charlie Ewels, back-rowers Ben Curry, Alex Dombrandt and Tom Pearson, half-backs Harry Randall and Marcus Smith, centres Oscar Beard, Max Ojomoh and Manu Tuilagi, and wings Will Muir and Tom Roebuck have all been surplus to requirement so far in terms of playing.
Cowan-Dickie and Blamire have rotated the third hooking position, Isiekwe picked up an illness in Girona resulting in his place going to Ewels, Randall was called up as cover for the injured Alex Mitchell, while Marcus Smith is still rehabbing after his injury setback in Spain the Monday before the opener against Wales.
Ten of these 15 players who haven't yet played this spring have now been named in the latest England training group – including Pearson, who has been recalled in place of the injured Curry, and Muir, who is covering this week for the absent Immanuel Feyi-Waboso as he is completing a university medical exam in Exeter.
The rehabilitating Smith wasn’t officially included for the York gathering, but he will attend camp to continue his injury return along with Alex Mitchell.
Aside from the potential promotion of players such as George Martin from the Murrayfield bench into the starting line-up, is there a debate to be had over whether any of England's match day surplus, particularly Smith if he is fit, can be upgraded into the starting XV – or at least make the game day 23 – to try and put a stop to the Irish gallop towards what would be their second successive Grand Slam title?
Borthwick needs to lift the mood and the England XV that started in Edinburgh simply can’t be the team that takes the field at Twickenham in 10 days.
43 England players – 2024 Six Nations
Unused (15): Blamire, Cowan-Dickie, Curry, Dombrandt, Heyes, Isiekwe, Ewels, Pearson; Beard, Muir, Ojomoh, Randall, Roebuck, Smith M, Tuilagi
Three starts (10): Chessum, Earl, George, Itoje, Roots, Underhill; Daly, Ford, Freeman, Slade
Two starts, one run as sub (2): Marler, Stuart
Two starts (3): Dingwall, Mitchell, Steward
One start, two runs as sub (2): Cole; Care
One start, one run as sub (1): Genge
One start (2): Furbank, Lawrence
Three runs as sub (2): Cunningham-South, Dan
Two runs as sub (3): Coles; Feyi-Waboso, Smith F
One run as sub (3): Obano, Martin; Spencer
Latest Comments
All of these media pundits always miss the obvious whenever they analyse what is ailing or assisting the game. Rugby always has contentious points for debate when picking apart individual games and finding fault with itself. All this focus and scrutiny on “speeding up the game”, “high ball in play” etc is all contextual to the fan. As a tv viewer, if you’re absorbed into a game, regardless if your team is playing or not, more ball in play time and action are all byproducts of the contest. A good contest subliminally affects your memory in selectively remembering all the good aspects. A poor contest and your brain has switched off because its a blowout and the result is never in doubt or it’s a real chore to watch and remain engaged throughout. The URC, Top 14 and English premiership are all competitions that feel like there’s real jeopardy each week. The dominance of Super rugby by NZ teams was unhealthy from a sustainable interest perspective. You can’t fault those teams or the players, but the lack of competitions won by SA and Australian teams long term was always going to test the faith and patience of die-hard and casual fans from those regions. SANZAR took their eye off the fans and fans voted with their feet and subscriptions. They were so concerned about expanding their product they forgot the golden rule about broadcasting live sport. Viewers tune in more when there’s an atmosphere and a true contest. You need to fill stadiums to create one, host unions need to do more to service ticket buyers, and this year proves the other, there’s more interest in Super rugby this year only because more games are competitive with less foregone conclusions. All these micro statistics bandied about, only interest the bean counters and trainspotters.
Go to commentsIt’s a good, timely wake up call for NZ Rugby (seem to be a few of them lately!) - sort out the bureaucratic nonsense at board level. We can’t expect to stay the number one option without keeping fans/players engaged. We’ve obviously been bleeding players to league for years but can’t let the floodgates open (although I think this headline is hyperbolic as it’s a result of a recent Warriors pathways system where they are tracking things more closely) Understand the need to focus boys on rugby if they’re at a proud rugby school too, don’t think it’s harsh at all re Barakat in Hamilton. Reward the committed players with squad positions. An elite 1st XV system in NZ has done more for league than they even realise, think it’s good to protect our game further.
Go to comments