Richie Mo'unga is a luxury, not a need, for the All Blacks
Described as the Crusaders' Steph Curry by incoming All Blacks head coach Scott Robertson, there is no doubt that he would like to select Richie Mo'unga from his overseas-base in Japan at Toshiba Brave Lupus.
After seven Super Rugby titles in seven years under Robertson, the two clearly have a successful working relationship that delivers results.
That partnership could have become a foundation of Robertson's All Blacks. But Mo'unga is not a necessity for the All Blacks. His availability and selection is desired, but not needed.
Perhaps it would be different if the Crusaders' version of Mo'unga was what the All Blacks got. If he was always on form and performed in the biggest games. Perhaps under Robertson, that is what would've happened had he stayed.
Mo'unga has made great strides as a Test player since his 2019 debut and when he's on, the All Blacks have looked unstoppable.
At Ellis Park against the Springboks with Ian Foster's job on the line, numerous Bledisloe beatdowns, and the Ireland quarter-final were some of his best games.
But when push came to shove on the biggest stage, Mo'unga was far below his potential. Below-par execution from the No 10, and a host of other players, played a key part in the loss in the Rugby World Cup final.
Will Jordan had an off night altogether, Jordie Barrett had a rollercoaster of highs and lows, and Mo'unga seemingly couldn't get anything right, not for a lack of trying.
On the second All Blacks' launch of the game a net loss of 25 metres came from a Mo'unga pass that missed the mark after a miscue with Will Jordan.
After scrambling back to secure the ball, Shannon Frizell's yellow card infringement occurred at the next ruck, leading to a gift three points for South Africa inside three minutes.
The poor execution from Mo'unga and Jordan won't show on the stat sheet but that bad play compounded to bigger problems.
Off a pod screen release to the backs a hurried pass hit the turf and bounced into the hands and knees of Jordan leading a knock-on and lost opportunity in the 20th minute.
He was under a lot of pressure from the South African rush, taking contact after the pass multiple times. That pressure seemed to put Mo'unga off his execution and timing early.
The All Blacks were terrible at diffusing the high ball in challenging conditions, with Mo'unga and Beauden Barrett coughing up way too many which played into the Springboks game plan. Of all the errors these were arguably the most costly.
There were gutsy plays, a try saving tackle on Siya Kolisi early in the second half followed by a repeat effort on another Bok to ensure a goal line dropout.
But Mo'unga's magic with the ball-in-hand disappeared.
Quick hands from Jordie Barrett finally beat Faf de Klerk on the edge about 25 metres out only for Mo'unga to drop it cold with a man outside him.
Attacking the Springboks goal line in the 51st minute a planned switch play involving Mo'unga, Jordie Barrett and Jordan resulted in a turnover with a knock-on, squandering a golden chance after the team turned down three points.
Even his best attacking play of the night was ruled out, dusting Kurt-Lee Arendse with a shimmy before a goosey to the outside around Damian de Allende, breaking away before a one-hand sling back inside to Aaron Smith for a would-be try.
When Beauden Barrett finally crossed the chalk Mo'unga missed a critical conversion from a tough spot that would have given the All Blacks the lead.
Mo'unga and the other kickers couldn't muster a drop goal attempt in the brief remaining possessions despite being a man down since the 27th minute.
He's an attacking genius and Super Rugby supremo, but at the highest level there are still wide variances in the quality of performances delivered.
Are the All Blacks eligibility rules meant to be changed for one player? And why should they for Mo'unga? No All Black before has given that special treatment.
His comments in his introductory press conference at Toshiba suggest he doesn't want to play for the All Blacks anymore.It is a shame that he has gone early, but there is no reason to bend the rules for him.
By the same token, there is no reason why he can't return after three years and give the Rugby World Cup a third try. The Japanese league has improved in standard and has been home too many of the Springboks' World Cup winners the last four years without detriment.
His experience in two unsuccessful campaigns is a valuable asset. You can't manufacture the pressure of World Cup knock-out games. Those lessons can help take Mo'unga's game to a new level, but only if he returns to the arena.
There is really only major trophy for Mo'unga to win, and that is the Rugby World Cup. He has more than enough Super Rugby titles, and tasted All Blacks success with Bledisloe Cups, Freedom Cups and Rugby Championships.
Once he's secured his financial future hopefully he will feel as a rugby player that there is one thing missing.
Latest Comments
Yeah I actually think it was Havili that took it off him. Not bad himself, but on the advice of Razor, who didn't even pursue it and use Havili on a split bench as 10 cover?
One huge cluster#$@% but I think you could be right, I liked O'Connor when he won at the Reds and I've just got a funny feeling he's going to dominate Super Rugby, kinda like how Cooper came back to the Wallabies as an experienced head and spat out South Africa. I think James could do the same with the Blues and other Aus sides. I'd really love Rivez to get a lot of minutes though.
Go to commentsI rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.
He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.
The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).
The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.
The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).
It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.
Go to comments