The All Blacks' game needs to be built around the Retallick's and Savea's
Not so long ago, I would’ve contended that Brodie Retallick was the best all around player in the world.
The man simply has it all: workrate, aggression, lineout prowess, tackling, ball-carrying, a short-passing game. If you were to draw up the perfect locking partner for the relentless intensity of Sam Whitelock, it would be Retallick.
Fair to say, then, that Retallick has rather underwhelmed since returning for All Blacks duty from Japan.
The niggle is still there, clearly. The man has been the most-penalised All Blacks in two tests against South Africa this season, plus the Bledisloe Cup clash at Eden Park and then again in Sunday’s (NZ time) 54-16 win over Wales.
The difference on this most recent occasion, though, is you could argue Retallick had been the best player on the park until being forced off with a shoulder problem after an hour.
Apparently Beauden Barrett was man of the match. Not sure why.
As a quick aside, I’m pleased for Barrett that he got to don the silver boot and cap combo for reaching the 100-test match milestone, but these things are rather meaningless.
The All Blacks play a lot of games now. And a lot of All Blacks, such as Barrett, play a lot of those games from off the bench.
If Grant Fox plays 46 tests as an All Black, does this now make Barrett twice as good a first five-eighth as he was? Is Kieran Read (127 tests) actually any better than Wayne Shelford (22 tests) or Zinzan Brooke (58)?
Games have lost their currency and our elite players are ostensibly fulltime All Blacks, rather than men who have club and provincial and franchise commitments as well.
Players are good in their era, but accumulating a lot of caps isn’t the same thing as being an all-time great. Anyway, let’s move on.
Cardiff was not a venue for midfield backs on Sunday. With halfback TJ Perenara clearing the ball with all the speed of a bloke on a building site lobbing bricks into a wheelbarrow, the All Blacks had to play through the forwards.
We’ve become accustomed to seeing this team try to combat rushing defensive lines by going around them. Whether by pass or by kick, the All Blacks have assumed that the space lies largely on the outside.
Against Wales, New Zealand went direct. All of the forward pack played their part, often running off a short ball from Retallick.
If the All Blacks are to avoid being shut down by advancing defensive lines, then this looms as an effective counter.
People want to see this team evolve. They want to see it develop and show that it has learned to win games by a variety of means.
There seemed to be plenty of Whitelock about how the game against Wales was won. Taking the ball up through the forwards, kicking for goal. It all felt like it had the captain’s imprint upon it.
Critical to it all, though, are the multi-skilled Retallick and hugely impressive Ardie Savea.
We love a back in this country. A guy with wheels and a bit of cheek, who revels in embarrassing defenders.
But if the All Blacks are to be a serious threat at the next world cup, then a lot of their game will need to be built around men such as Whitelock, Retallick and Savea. If you do want to talk all-time, then Whitelock and Retallick would be great players in any era and Savea is fast on the way.
You can’t say fairer than that.
Latest Comments
I think it was a better rugby destination for him.
He was developed in Melbourne and had a relatively brief stint there. I think he was possibly dropped out of the squad for the return of someone like To'omua (also a Melbourne local) in 2019 ahead of the RWC. But then he wasn't picked up by another Australian team and went to play in Japan when he only really seemed to play a hat full of top level games (maybe injured for long periods??) before he went on to Scotland. But it was only in Scotland that he started to get a lot of consistent game time and selection.
The thing is, no one talked about him being a missed opportunity in Australia before he left - a little like Mac Hansen. But he has been able to forge a top level career since leaving. Both men only had a handful (5 or 6?) games at Super Rugby level before they made a decision to leave (or had it made for them I suppose). Other countries have gone on to develop them and that is great for them and it is probably good for the global game as it means the best players are rising to the top - if not in their birth country than in another. I think there are a lot of issues with poor player development in Australia but I don't know if these two blokes are very good examples of it.
Go to commentsOk I understand. Give them my number please Nick.
Go to comments