The abnormal stat that shows signs of a deliberate plan for Beauden Barrett
All Blacks first five-eighth Beauden Barrett is pushing through his final season in New Zealand with the Blues and continues to come under fire for his uncharacteristic performances.
With one final chance at the Rugby World Cup later this year, Barrett has to be forgiven for working to a clear preservation plan to get him there.
There is one stat in particular that indicates clearly what is going on with Barrett this season.
With nine games of Super Rugby and 720 minutes of action played, he has made just 20 tackles all season. That is one every 36 minutes, almost a half a game of rugby.
He went through one fixture against the Hurricanes in round three without logging a single tackle or tackle attempt.
Combined with the most kicks in the competition it is clear Barrett is working to a plan to come through this Super Rugby season unscathed.
And that should be accepted by the New Zealand rugby public as a necessary means to an end.
The 31-year-old’s illustrious international career includes two World Rugby Player of the Year crowns, the 2015 Rugby World Cup, countless Bledisloe Cups and Rugby Championships. He has done it all.
As cold as it sounds, no one will remember much about Super Rugby Pacific when they look back on 2023, nor Barrett’s efforts for the Blues.
That he is still even on the field is pushing it. Johnny Sexton has already been wrapped in cotton wool by Leinster and Ireland.
South Africa’s inspirational captain Siya Kolisi has gone down with a serious injury, and is now in a race against the odds to even be on the field in France.
Barrett has one final chance in his lifetime to make a World Cup run with the All Blacks, like a few others in the side. He does not need to play.
The 113-cap All Black still showed he can turn it on when needed, with a chip and chase coming off his own line against the Crusaders that nearly produced a length of the field special. He tore apart the Rebels to shake off doubts earlier in the season.
Even so, attacking magic won’t be what wins a World Cup for New Zealand. He doesn’t need to be in career-best dazzling form.
Of all the All Black first fives, Barrett is the biggest body and is the most defensively sound. He has saved as many Test tries as he has scored over his career.
France, Ireland, and South Africa are all defensively bruising sides who don’t give up a lot of points. Ireland are the best of them.
The All Blacks need to tighten the screws with their defence more than anything.
The Melbourne and Twickenham Tests against Australia and England last year were colossal collapses down the stretch. A repeat of those showings will see the All Blacks bow out of the Cup.
In defence of the embattled first five, Blues coach Daniel Halangahu told Stuff.co.nz: “People want to see him, but I think everyone wants the World Cup trophy in the cabinet a little more.”
Let the Barrett preservation plan continue.
No different to McCaw and Carter prior to WC.
Don't agree.
He won't be match hardened..just like the failed rotation strategy under Henry..we ran out of first 5's because they couldn't handle contact v Fr. If he can't handle it he shouldn't be selected.
Coach, I do remember Naas Botha. Barry John, the Welsh Wizard of the early 70ies, was also not renowned for his tackling! In any case, yesterday's game by BB against the Reds disproves my theory - BB was superb. I was wrong, he's up for it.
Thanks Coach for calling me - at 73 - too young! And Craig, I hope you're right about BB. But I imagine you'd have to work very hard at avoiding contact to have a zero tackle count across 80 minutes! It's worth remembering too, that the last game - I can't remember which - where both BB and Perofeta were available, BB was on the team sheet to play at 15 and Perofeta at 10. What do you think that says? (I do think he'd have less chance of maintaining a zero tackle count - if that was the plan - at 15).
A very young 73 I might add . Greg you will remember Naas Botha then. He only played 22 Tests due to isolation in SA but he averaged 15 points per game. He tackled about 10 times in his career which lasted about 17 years. His coach said 30 odd years ago that he felt there was no need to put him at risk with tackling and naturally people called him "bang Brook" scaredy pants, but in effect he only had one serious injury over his career. The point I make, if the player adds great value, then do all you can to protect him or her for the Big Games. People remember the Trophy Winners and Naas won many for his teams. Think Jonny Sexton...
Craig, so correct you are! Unfortunately G and Greg are too young to know anything about having players who have been in every situation there is in International sport. There is and always will be no substitute for experience, especially in what will be an intensely pressurised WC. As a Saffa I hope that the selectors follow our esteemed colleagues and don't pick him and do us all a favour. Just the calmness in his eyes before a big match is enough to give the other players confidence. It would be great if you left him at home.
I was at the RWC 2011 when we lost 3 fly-haves and we kept calling one more player when needed but only when needed. Today BB is the third (at best) 10 in NZ. BB has not had a really good ABs game vs top 5 opposition in 4 years.
Honestly I'm all for it, Richie Mo'unga is a great Super Rugby player but he has never proven himself in international Rugby and we already lost one world cup with him in charge, I'd rather not repeat that. Beauden is and has always been better suited to test football.
No he hasn't since the world cup bb has been terrible he's been the worst 1st we have now dmack is back I don't see a spot for him
You have never won a world cup with BB in charge at number 10 either. And what caused the loss to England in 2019. I would say that poor play by the forwards who were bossed about by the English pack was a huge contributor. Not to say a couple of dubious selection decisions also played a part. Hansen has confessed as much.
Why accept poor performance to save himself for RWC? All other ABs are playing full steam ahead for their teams and to be selected.
Why should BB be different?
You're 100% right why should the blues suffer because bb is playing trash rugby he does not deserve the black jersey at all
It's either that or he's gun-shy as a result of concussions etc. My bet it's the latter - and I don't blame him if he is. But if so, he should get out now, otherwise the RWC will be one more humiliation.
Greg, one thing I would never accuse any of the Barrett’s of is being gun-shy. They all give 100% (just like their Dad did for Taranaki/Hurricanes for many years) top level rugby is in their DNA. The article makes sense to me, he is under protection cos he is a fab defender and aside from the concussions, has had a relatively injury free career. Have faith peeps, BB will perform when it counts.