The Bristol verdict on a rare Premiership match without having TMO
Pat Lam has admitted he will be glad that the TMO will be back in action when Bristol face Wasps this Saturday in Coventry following last weekend’s unusual experience of not having the television match official review incidents as they happened during a Gallagher Premiership match.
Premiership Rugby announced last Friday afternoon that the game later that night between Bristol and Bath at Ashton Gate had been postponed until 5pm the following afternoon due to the death of Queen Elizabeth II.
The fixture was originally set to be the live TV lift-off for the new 2022/23 league season on BT Sport but its delay until Saturday meant the trucks that had been in situ at Bristol had since moved on elsewhere and this late development meant it wasn’t possible to provide the necessary pictures for TMO Rowan Kitt to assist referee Tom Foley.
Not having the fourth official available resulted in a lot of niggles and off-the-ball stuff, including the bizarre sight of Bath hooker Niall Annett, an unused replacement at the time, getting red-carded for joining in a melee that broke out among the players.
“It does highlight (what can happen) when you don’t have one,” said Lam, who will be glad that Kitt will definitely be in action this Saturday at Coventry as the TMO in support of referee Karl Dickson.
“Of course, everyone would say, ‘Don’t have the TMO’ but I think at this level you do. Both Johann (van Graan, the Bath coach) and I said before the game, it was unforeseen circumstances that had happened and we just had to adapt and adjust and move with it. You know for both sides there were things that normally would be picked up but that is the way it is.
“It just highlights the importance of the TMO as we go through, so I thought both teams just adapted to it and we have moved on. Nobody would think the game was fast. There were just 30 minutes ball in play, it was such a slow game in that sense.”
The midweek disciplinary hearing outcome for the red-carded Annett resulted in a two-match ban for an incident that left the Bath front-rower 'apologetic, remorseful and ashamed'.
Latest Comments
Which country do you think was instrumental in developing rugby in Argentina which then spun off into the rest of Latin South America? South Africa was touring Argentine in the 50's with their Junior Bok side on three months development tours. And they didn't do it to cultivare players for the Boks. Regarding Africa you are not taking into account that South Africa itself is an emerging nation. The rugby union has prioritised the development of rugby in South African rural communities with outstanding success.
It has taken 15 years to build the participation of rugby both in playing and watching. For South Africa on its own to build a viable international rugby competition in africa will take generations - not decades. New Zealanders seem to resent the fact that SA has doubled the income of the URC since their inclusion. If New Zealand Rugby hadn't insisted on have a disproportionate slice of the pie in Super Rugby, SA might not have fled the coop.
Go to commentsDon't think you've watched enough. I'll take him over anything I's seen so far. But let's see how the future pans out. I'm quietly confident we have a row of 10's lined uo who would each start in many really good teams.
Go to comments