Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The four clubs fighting for Luke Cowan-Dickie and what salary they'll probably get him for

Luke Cowan-Dickie (Photo by Dan Mullan/Getty Images)

Four clubs are competing for the signature of England hooker Luke Cowan-Dickie.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 6’1, 113kg hooker came through the Penzance-Newlyn (Pirates) Minis section and is considered – alongside Jack Nowell – as one of the biggest successes in the history of the Chiefs academy system.

With a RugbyPass Index score of 88, he is ranked as the 10th best hooker the planet, and the second best in the Gallagher Premiership.

The Cornishman’s preference is to stay at his home club Exeter Chiefs, but a significant offer from a Premiership rival could yet turn his head.

And he has plenty of offers to choose from too.

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

RugbyPass understand that four clubs have made offers for the Truro born front-rower – Leicester Tigers, Worcester Warriors, Harlequins and of course his current team, Exeter Chiefs.

If he decides not to stay at the Chiefs, Harlequins are thought to be favorites to win the race to sign the 25-year-old. The West London side’s incumbent at hooker is veteran Dave Ward, who will be 34 when the 2019/2020 season starts.

A RugbyPass source has suggested the salary that would get the young frontrower over the line is in the region of £350,000 per annum.

ADVERTISEMENT

Time is on Cowan-Dickie’s side, as he’s not expected to make an official announcement until the new year.

Meanwhile, Chiefs are remaining coy about his future at the club.

“Talks are ongoing,” Rob Baxter told DevonLive this week. “No decision has been made – I can’t tell you he has signed or that he has not signed – but it is an ongoing situation.

“Where the clubs being named have come from, I don’t know. It is not something that I am aware of.”

Cowan-Dickie has fallen down the England Number 2 pecking order due to injury problems, making just 9 appearances for the Red Rose since picking up his first cap in 2015. His lack of current involvement with England would if anything could be seen as a bonus going into 2019.

ADVERTISEMENT

In 2013, he was one of five fellow Chiefs players to help England Under-20s lift the Junior World Championships in France.

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

KOKO Show | July 22nd | Full Throttle with Brisbane Test Review and Melbourne Preview

New Zealand v South Africa | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

USA vs England | Men's International | Full Match Replay

France v Argentina | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

Lions Share | Episode 4

Zimbabwe vs Namibia | Rugby Africa Cup Final | Full Match Replay

USA vs Fiji | Women's International | Full Match Replay

Tattoos & Rugby: Why are tattoos so popular with sportspeople? | Amber Schonert | Rugby Rising Locker Room Season 2

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 15 minutes ago
Competing interests and rotated squads: What the 'player welfare summer' is really telling us

Thanks for the further background to player welfare metrics Nick.


Back on the last article I noted that WR is now dedicating a whole section in their six-point business plan to this topic. It also noted that studies indicated 85-90% of workload falls outside of playing. So in respect to your point on the classification of ‘involvements’ included even subs with a low volume of minutes, it actually goes further, to the wider group of players that train as if they’re going to be required to start on the weekend, even if they’re outside the 23. That makes even the 30-35 game borderline pale into insignificance.


No doubt it is won of the main reasons why France has a quota on the number of one clubs players in their International camps, and rotate in other clubs players through the week. The number of ‘invisible’ games against a player suggests the FFRs 25 game limit as more appropriate?


So if we take it at face value that Galthie and the FFR have got it right, only a dozen players from the last 60 international caps should have gone on this tour. More players from the ‘Scotland 23’ than the more recent 23.


The only real pertinent question is what do players prefer more, health or money? There are lots of ethical decisions, like for instance whether France could make a market like Australia’s where their biggest rugby codes have yearly broadcast deals of 360 and 225 million euros. They do it by having a 7/8 month season.

68 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING John Barclay makes concerning Owen Farrell observation despite Test spot calls Barclay makes concerning Farrell observation despite Test spot calls