1
The Koch verdict on his Bomb Squad's five/three bench reshuffle
By Rugby365
Replacement prop Vincent Koch has insisted that the Springboks’ famed ‘Bomb squad’ won’t lose its assertiveness despite a five/three forwards/back bench split. Springboks head coach Jacques Nienaber has discarded the preferred six/two bench split between forwards and backs for this Saturday’s Rugby Championship clash against Australia in Adelaide.
The ‘Bomb Squad’ tactic came under scrutiny in the last few weeks following the 23-35 round two defeat to the All Blacks as the world champions found themselves in a conundrum when wing Jesse Kriel left the field in the opening minutes at Ellis Park. It meant that the backline had to be reshuffled, resulting in a lot of players having to play out of position.
In the wake of the defeat, the coach admitted having two backline players on the bench was a big risk and he has now opted to select three backline players on the bench as his team looks to bounce back versus the Wallabies.
Nienaber has brought in fly-half Elton Jantjies as an extra backs replacement and also swapped Frans Steyn for Willie le Roux at No23. Scrum-half Jaden Hendrikse is the other backline player on the bench with back-row forward Jasper Wiese not named in the matchday squad to allow the inclusion of the third backs replacement.
A move like this may weaken the impact of the ‘Bomb Squad’, especially regarding the forward battle in the closing stages. However, sub tighthead Koch insisted the reshuffle from a six/two bench split to five/three will not be a big issue.
“I don’t think it will have a massive impact, each one in the bomb squad have a specific role,” said the prop “Whether it is a six/two or five/three bench split, we all know what to do when we get on the field. I don’t think the dynamic will change much. Once we get a chance to get on the pitch we just have to make sure we keep the intensity where the starters left off.”
Koch revealed the Wallabies pack will pose a new challenge for the Springboks, who were under pressure during their last outing against the All Blacks. “Australia has a really good pack. They have a good front row on the bench as well so it is going to be a challenge for us, but our focus is mainly on ourselves and how we can be better. It is going to be a good challenge.”
Trending on RugbyPass
2
All Blacks XV player ratings vs Munster
3
Suaalii strikes awe as Wallabies lose midfielder
4
Scott Robertson responds about handling errors
5
Latest Comments
Nah, that just needs some more variation. Chip kicks, grubber stabs, all those. Will Jordan showed a pretty good reason why the rush was bad for his link up with BB.
If you have an overlap on a rush defense, they naturally cover out and out and leave a huge gap near the ruck.
It also helps if both teams play the same rules. ARs set the offside line 1m past where the last mans feet were😅
Go to commentsYeah nar, should work for sure. I was just asking why would you do it that way?
It could be achieved by outsourcing all your IP and players to New Zealand, Japan, and America, with a big Super competition between those countries raking it in with all of Australia's best talent to help them at a club level. When there is enough of a following and players coming through internally, and from other international countries (starting out like Australia/without a pro scene), for these high profile clubs to compete without a heavy australian base, then RA could use all the money they'd saved over the decades to turn things around at home and fund 4 super sides of their own that would be good enough to compete.
That sounds like a great model to reset the game in Aus. Take a couple of decades to invest in youth and community networks before trying to become professional again. I just suggest most aussies would be a bit more optimistic they can make it work without the two decades without any pro club rugby bit.
Go to comments