1
The Nigel Owens verdict on the big calls that upset a nation
After what was arguably one of the best weekends of Rugby World Cup action fans have seen, there were a number of incidents that have since been dissected.
ADVERTISEMENT
Referee Nigel Owens has addressed some of the biggest calls, perhaps leaving a few more questions than answers at times, but hopefully clearing up a few of the big issues.
France in particular were unhappy following their epic contest with South Africa, and Owens has looked directly at two of the main talking points.
The Eben Etzebeth intercept attempt
In the 7th minute of the match, with France already 7-0 up and dominating, they surged forward and looked to have an overlap out wide. Etzebeth leaped to intercept and knocked the ball down with one hand. The crowd felt it was a knock on, but the officials said it went backwards or at least, laterally, out his hand.
Owen’s explains why the game played on.
“He is very, very lucky. He goes with one hand out. There is no way he’s going to catch the ball, so what he tries to do, he tries to knock the ball backwards, which is legal! As long as you knock the ball backwards. If he had made contact with that ball and that ball had gone forward, then it would be a deliberate knock on and a pretty certain yellow card as well.
“When you look at the footage, there’s a lot of debate about this. Some of you saying, ‘well I think it’s gone forward’, some of you saying ‘no I think it’s gone backwards’. It really is a very very difficult one. It’s impossible to see 100%, to put your house on it, has it gone forward or has it gone back.
“So the referee looks at this, and I have to say, I tend to agree with the referee here because it’s very difficult to say that’s its gone forward or gone back, so the referees view (and the TMOs view) is, the ball went backwards – or certainly didn’t go clearly forward – and therefore we have a play on.
“But remember, he’s very, very lucky. If that goes forward, it’s a pretty certain penalty and yellow card.”
ADVERTISEMENT
The Kwagga Smith penalty win
Owens gave his explanation for why Smith was not penalised when he won a crucial breakdown turnover in the 68th minute.
“Some of you have been debating. ‘What about the penalties, hands on ground, legal or not?’ Okay.. Nothing in law says that you can’t put your hands on the ground. So we can’t say that any player that puts his hand on the ground is committing an offence, because it doesn’t say that in the law. So the way that the referees will deal with this, is the law of the contact tackle area. So if you come in to jackal the ball, what the jackler must do? He must release the ball carrier before he regathers on the ball, or if he’s not in contact with the ball carrier, when he comes in, he must maintain his own body weight.
“So what he can’t do, is put his hands away or beyond the ball to support his body weight and then come on to the ball to gather. Now if he comes in and tries to go for the ball but in doing so because of the speed, his hands touches the ground around the ball, but that is not keeping his weight up – which means he’s supporting his own bodyweight – then we won’t necessarily penalise the hand touching the ground. We’d only penalise it if the hands are too far or he’s using the ground to support his bodyweight.
“So that’s what the referee decides. The referee needs to decide, was that hand supporting the bodyweight before he goes onto the ball and if so, it will be a penalty. If he feels well, he just touched the ground around the ball, it’s not supporting his bodyweight, then we’d have a play on.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Pollard landed the 52m penalty to give South Africa a 29-25 lead.
You can watch the full video below (territory dependant).
Etzebeth and Smith will both be in action again on Saturday, when South Africa take on England in the semi-final of this year’s Rugby World Cup.
Go AB
RugbyPass just forgot to publish the verdict of World Rugby on the way O’Keefe refereed this game. The Allmighty organism saw five major mistakes in the game including Kolbe’s early race and K.Smith hand on the floor.
We can still hope we’ll see this published here but it is available for any who want to see.
If Brace could be replaced so quickly, I guess O’Keefe could be too.
Gauthier, Kolbe is just that fast
With all due respect. the game has been played, final whistle has blown. RSA 29-28 FRA. we can not turn back time. in this world cup the game between RSA and FRA was the hardest and best of all games. to Come back to all the comments on the RSA FRA game. its funny how we all blame the refferee when our teams loose, we are human and it will happen. what we can do now is look forward to the semi finals and final. and we will meet again in 2027. My blood is green and will always be green win or loose you are all still our HEROES. go Bokke !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!🏆
Totaly agree with you, m'y Heart IS blue and broken he IS but score IS done….i Hope Mr Erasmus maye have thé same spirit after a defeat..
I Hope semi final and final will be great games again
No comments on Kolbe who is in the field when Ramos kicks the ball. Why not call for TMO? ... Huget who played 6 years with them said they never succed to intercept Ramos.As for the h2h contact of Du Toit on Danty which is nothing more than an assault and deserves a red card...the video is cut and no TMO request either. Regardless of the final decisions, not using video for these 3 important situations is a mistake in itself that feeds the frustration of the other team during the game and tarnishes the image of rugby after.
sour sour sour
No it was the TMO’s doing what the French do when in France as the saying goes. That lost replay footage when Barns asked for it the last time we lost to France in Paris remember when you froschfressers cheated again. Let that be a lesson for the surrender monkeys - what goes around comes around as that saying goes.
Regarding etzebeth, his body being in motion, he transmits to the ball a force going to the French camp. His hand is flat and does not surround the ball, he cannot bring it back to his camp, nor any intention to do so. Just a forward even if probably a few cm. I believe that the referee's mistake is not to ask for the video, which would have allowed him to assess precisely the ball trajectory and evaluate the player's intention, which is to intercept not to bring back it.
Have you been eating lemons
For kwagga Smith contest Nigel Owens is wrong and the world rugby rules says :
‘supported’ - Owens is correct.
South Africans and the Irish are the worst at supporting body weight, they reach over and lie over other bodies and quite often rest forearm on ground, Marx was probably the worst. Barnes for whatever reason will let this go in the final, think that'll allow South Africa to win the final for whomever they face.
The mighty abs
I don’t think Barnes can referee England in the final.
You Sir, are a SP…. FN…. DP….
Dont have an idea of what you are talking about…. Probably an English supporter…🤦♂️
Owens clearly believes Smith was supporting his own bodyweight.
He supports the ref for the Etsebeth decision but cant for the second just stating the law .
Read the article before commenting. Another idiot!
Are you dumb, deaf or just plain stupid…? He just stated all.the laws and gave reasons around the decision that was made and delivered his own opinion. Nigel Owens….. “this is not soccer”