The resurrection of Dan Cole and three other England talking points
It’s now or never on Saturday night for Steve Borthwick and struggling England. For nine months, the repeated rhetoric from the rookie Test-level head coach has been that he had a crap inheritance from Eddie Jones, that he was developing a restorative game plan, and that a winning blend wasn’t far away.
Sadly, it hasn’t stacked up. Six wounding losses in nine outings – five defeats in the last six – is a testament to the foot-in-mouth lack of progress where it really matters, out on the field.
England have been a right old missed-tackle mess in conceding 30 tries in 2023. Their blunt attack has also been a brutal spectacle, while their inexperienced Test rugby coaching staff haven’t yet demonstrated that they are collectively capable of thriving at international level.
With recent results painfully going down the pan, Borthwick has bet the house on England beating Argentina at the start of this Rugby World Cup and everything that has previously happened getting instantly forgotten.
He’s right. A single 80 minutes can eclipse the unconvincing 720 that have gone before as the stakes are remarkably high in Marseille. Win and England have pool momentum and every chance of making the semi-finals on the weaker side of the draw.
Lose, though, and Borthwick will be facing the unthinkable – a defeat to Japan in Nice on September 17 and World Cup elimination just two games into their four-match group schedule.
Having been with the squad every step of the way so far at France 2023, starting out with the week at base camp in Le Touquet-Paris-Plage followed by the trip south on Thursday, RugbyPass sets the scene for a fixture that England can’t stuff up:
The unlikely resurrection of Dan Cole
The last thing anyone would have predicted four years ago at the wounding end of the last World Cup was that Dan Cole would be the England No3 for the start of this latest campaign. He was reduced to a sweaty, crumpled lump by the Springboks scrum in Yokohama, a figure of fun for all the wrong reasons, and it resulted in three wilderness years under Jones where he was overlooked with his Test career seemingly finished.
Not so. Having coached him at Leicester in that time, Borthwick recalled Cole at the start of this year after he succeeded Jones and now, incredibly, after six non-descript appearances off the bench, the 36-year-old has followed up his start in the warm-up loss to Fiji a fortnight ago with selection to start against the Pumas.
England have had their scrum inconsistencies recently. For example, look at how they went from winning three penalties and grabbing nine first-half points in Cardiff at the start of August to that picture completely changing in the second half and the penalty decisions going the other way.
Asked by RugbyPass the other day at Le Touquet if he had a point to prove at Stade Velodrome given his last World Cup appearance was such a nightmare, Cole claimed: “No, no. I am happy to be in the squad, I’m here to help the squad be the best that we can be.
"What has happened has happened. I have spent long enough thinking about it and moved on. I am more interested in what is about to happen than what has gone before.”
He is correct; it is all about the here and now. However, if he fails to suitably steel the pack against the Pumas, Cole's selection ahead of the benched Will Stuart and the excluded Kyle Sinckler (who missed some training during the week) will become a stick to beat Borthwick with.
Sinfield’s reputation is on the line
Kevin Sinfield is a lovely, lovely man. Right now, though, he is in an unenviable position with England having leaked 30 tries in nine matches on his watch as their rookie Test-level defence coach – that’s a try on average every 24 minutes, which isn’t acceptable if you want to be successful in international rugby coaching.
The Leeds Rhinos playing legend at least has the right sort of people pumping his tyres at the minute. Sinfield revealed last Tuesday that Phil Larder, the ex-league coach who was in charge of the England defence when the 2003 Rugby World Cup was won, has regularly been in his ear to such an extent that he even warned him about the negativity of the UK media.
Larder, judging by what he has been saying to Sinfield, hasn’t forgotten his critical treatment over the leaky defence that saw England bomb out of the 1999 World Cup at the quarter-final stage. Four years later, he had helped Woodward and co conquer the world.
It’s an encouraging lesson for Sinfield to bite into, that things can get hugely better if you smartly persevere and use adversity in the right way. Right now, though, there is no evidence that England have the capability to properly shut the door on Argentina.
They had the cards excuse when conceding three tries to both Wales and Ireland last month, but there was no numerical imbalance straw to clutch when also conceding three tries to Fiji last time out and how they failed to exit and then defended poorly at 22-23 with the result in the balance was terrible, England going on to lose 22-30. That sloppiness just can’t be repeated.
Mitchell quip doesn’t sound inspiring
A remark by Alex Mitchell at his eve-of-match media briefing at the Velodrome piqued the interest as it highlighted how playing for England currently is all about a dull collective structure rather than you being allowed to be the player that you instinctively are from the start.
England’s creativity has been blunt all year, from Nick Evans’ temporary involvement to the summer arrival of Richard Wigglesworth. It just hasn’t happened for them in attack. However, rather than let the shackles off and stop England from being so, so predictable, it appears that no matter who gets a shirt it’s about sticking to the rugby-by-numbers plan rather than having a cut.
Asked what he is hoping to bring on Saturday night, Mitchell replied: “Just for me I have just got to try and control the game, get the team to tick and when I can put some energy and tempo into the side I will try and do that. But again, it’s stick to the game plan.”
Sticking to the game plan hasn’t got England anywhere in 2023 and although Mitchell is set for just the second start of his fledgling Test career inside a fortnight, the message is that even though he has a canny knack at club level of breaking defences with sniping runs, that approach is proscribed with England and the instruction is to instead either pass the ball to George Ford or to repeatedly box-kick it away. That doesn’t sound inspiring.
The very different selection from 10 months ago
There are good omens to be found for England if they search hard enough. For instance, the last time Saturday’s referee Mathieu Raynal was in charge of Borthwick’s side, they defeated Wales in Cardiff last February in the Guinness Six Nations and only conceded six penalties to Wales’ nine. Twelve years ago, as well, England beat the Pumas 13-9 in Dunedin when the countries previously clashed at the start of a Rugby World Cup.
However, a very different type of stat highlights that this is very much the Borthwick show and that he can’t keep on blaming Jones for the lingering rot. It was last November when England were beaten 29-30 by Argentina at Twickenham, a match that the then-Leicester boss watched at home just weeks before he was to become Jones’ successor.
Just five of that Autumn Nations Series match day 23 – Freddie Steward, Manu Tuilagi, Ellis Genge, Maro Itoje and Tom Curry – are on the teamsheet for this Stade Velodrome rematch, so blaming inheritance will no longer wash.
This is Borthwick’s England and he is in dire need of a result to radically change the optics of his underwhelming tenure.
Latest Comments
They would improve a lot of such a scheme were allowed though JD, win win :p
Go to commentsI rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.
He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.
The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).
The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.
The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).
It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.
Go to comments