The simple explanation to Louis Rees-Zammit's strange NFL role after confusion
Louis Rees-Zammit completed his second match in American football on Saturday in a preseason loss to the Detroit Lions, and like the week before, he was tried out in a variety of roles.
In his first match at Kansas City Chiefs' home ground, Arrowhead Stadium, the 23-year-old returned a kickoff 27 yards, was used as a gunner on the punt team and has been singled out online for his pass protection late in the match.
But fans who saw the former Wales wing making strides in rugby union have been left slightly confused that in both preseason matches now he has been used to take kickoffs.
Rees-Zammit established a name for himself for his prowess with ball in hand during his time in rugby. While he was comfortable kicking the ball from hand, he was never deployed as a place kicker. Understandably therefore, some have been left a little confused at this new role with the Chiefs.
There is a simple answer to this though, and it has to do with the expertise a rugby player has compared to an NFL kicker, specifically his ability to tackle.
"It's less about LRZ making the kick and more him being there as an extra person to tackle the return guy," The Podcast Nobody Asked For explained on X. "Most kickers wouldn't do that, or at least not as effectively as a rugby convert. Basically gives them an extra guy on defence for returns."
Though somewhat strange, there were hints that Rees-Zammit would be used as a kicker as early as May. "Louis has done above and beyond what I expected," assistant head coach and special teams coordinator Dave Toub said.
"He can kick field goals, he can kickoff, he can be a kickoff guy for us. He's every bit as good as Justin (Reid) is at moving the football and stuff like that on kickoffs. And he's really working hard at the returner job. I've got him in there as a starter right now so he gets as many reps as he can. He's a student of the game — he comes in after practice, he wants to be great, he's a great athlete."
Latest Comments
I'm pretty sure Foster started with easier games though - like playing Aussie in our own backyard etc.
Go to commentsFunny, isn't it - you ignore the comment around
"In NZ, the population with Samoan heritage is 185,000 people, or just under 4%.
Tongans in NZ are around 85,000 people, or just under 2%."
How does that tie into naturalizing Samoans - did we import 185,000 Samoans for rugby purposes?
Or how about the comment about Polynesians -Nah, basically, show your complete ignorance around the Pacific and it's people....
Then to show real ignorance - your comment, "You are not" - well actually, I'm pretty much reflective of NZ really - I have Irish (including former IRA members - back in the 1920s, I might add), Scottish, and English heritage - oh and a little bit Maori as well, then in my greater family (cousins) we have Samoan as well.
Appears according to your views - NZ is still part of the British Empire, NZ is composed of just two peoples - white settlers and pesky Maori and everyone else in the country is not really a Kiwi.
Can you confirm again how many Polynesians are in Ireland - it must be heaps, given you have 20% of your team composed of people with that heritage.
Let's face it - you come from a country that set up a scheme called "project players" - namely to identify foreign professional players who could be signed up and under the 3-year residency play for Ireland.
How you compare "project players" to NZ being a natural home and destination to people of the Pacific - well can't help you if you are that ignorant.
Go to comments