'There wasn't going to be a 28-0 win or even a draw'
Gregor Townsend has admitted he was never hoping Scotland would be awarded a 28-0 win over France following last month's Guinness Six Nations postponement, unlike what happened in November when a match versus Fiji was called off in the Autumn Nations Cup.
That Murrayfield postponement resulted in the Scots getting a four-try bonus victory given to them off the pitch, but Townsend has explained there was never an expectation this the same decision would happen after France were at fault for the February 28 Six Nations match in Paris getting scratched.
A dozen French players and four members of staff, including boss Fabien Galthie, all tested positive for Covid-19, but Scotland boss Townsend knew from the off the match would be rescheduled rather than his team getting gifted a walk-over victory in the boardroom.
"No, we were all aware of the rules going into the tournament. There wasn't going to be a 28-0 win or even a draw. It would have been a delay of game or postponement," explained Townsend, who has made four changes to his XV for Sunday's round four match with Ireland.
"You could follow all the rules and protocols but you could still get the virus into your camp. We have a situation where our players are coming from other teams every second week so I don't think we could have set something up because it could be down to bad luck as well as any other circumstance. We want the game played, so do France. Let's hope it gets played in the next few weeks."
No date for this rescheduled match has yet been confirmed as conversations are still ongoing to ensure Scotland can call on their players who play for clubs in England and France. March 26 is the suggested date for the rescheduling but it would fall outside the World Rugby regulation nine player release window, something that has prompted the Scots into having discussions to secure guarantees that stars such as skipper Stuart Hogg, who plays for Exeter, and Finn Russell, who is attached to Racing, would not miss the rearranged game.
"The players are focused. They know we are likely to have three games in three weeks so they are up for that... we know there is a date out there, the 26th, that would suit everybody and that would link it very close to the tournament, just finishing a week after the other games.
"But there are a few things that have to be sorted, notably getting all our players available and agreeing on the release from clubs in England and France. I believe those discussions are ongoing and I'm not sure when they will be resolved but we hope that will be soon.
"It's not going to be my decision on this but for a tournament of the standing of the Six Nations, you need the best players playing against the best players. Now sometimes you get injuries but we want to have a full group of players to select from and that is what everybody is working towards."
Latest Comments
Thats exactly the criticism Ed, that it has already been done for generations. A strong SA, in many respects, should certainly help African rugby develop. You'd have to think they'd acclimatize much better being drawn to a pro SA club than say a European. Hopefully the fact theyve gone private (is that right Graham?) should enable this sort of change.
Go to commentsPerofeta came back and was available for the eoyt right? Or was that why Love was in the squad (but got injured in the last week)?
It was such a frustrating year. Perofeta looked a service stop gap until Jordan was fit, but then got injured. Plummer was selected because of Pero's injury and dmac shat the bed in the second half in Australia but Clarke (?) got himself binned at the 65 min mark so Plummer couldn't come on (at least with the risk adverse Razors thinking) when he was planned to.
So many other exciting opportunities that could have happened without injuries, but then theyre probably balanced by knowing Sititi probably wouldn't have been given a chance without multiple injuries happened.
Go to comments