'Those answers don't just come in 24 hours' - Mark McCall urges patience around Saracens' salary cap drama
Mark McCall says everyone at Saracens is aware of the need to be patient in pursuit of answers over the club’s long-term future.
The Allianz Park side have appealed against a 35-point deduction in the Gallagher Premiership and a fine of more than £5million for breaching salary cap rules for the last three seasons.
While there remain plenty of questions, director of rugby McCall is determined to focus on on-field matters ahead of Sunday’s Heineken Champions Cup opener at Racing 92.
He said: “I do think we all understand that we need to be patient for those answers. Those answers don’t just come in 24 hours and we understand that, so for now we just get on with the rugby.
“We get on with preparing well, keeping the group together and that is what we plan to do.
“I am not saying it is easy or straightforward, but because we’ve had a lot of cohesion at this club and continuity, there are some strong relationships and I believe that will see us through what will undoubtedly be a very challenging period.”
The 51-year-old admitted the biggest task facing him is keeping the squad united for the tests ahead, which could potentially include trying to avoid relegation.
He added: “I think that’s my responsibility from the club, that’s my clear direction from the club, and in the meantime, the club will deal with everything else.
“We need to carry on what we’re doing at the training ground and that’s to prepare for rugby matches and keep this brilliant group of players and brilliant staff as united as they can be.”
After winning the Premiership and Champions Cup last season, Saracens could be involved in a scrap to stay up this time around if they are deducted 35 points.
But McCall defiantly insisted: “A challenge is a challenge. It’s a hell of a challenge – if the points deduction stays what it is – to try and avoid relegation, and it’s a challenge we haven’t had to experience before as a group.
“It is one which we will get our head around and relish if we have to do that, but we don’t know that for definite yet.”
One issue McCall will welcome is the task of re-introducing those who played at the World Cup.
Some have trained this week and he hinted a few could be involved at Racing this weekend, but England captain Owen Farrell is unlikely to be among them.
“Owen and I have had a long chat,” McCall said. “He shouldered a lot of responsibility in that competition and I don’t know what it’s like to lose a World Cup final.
“We need to give him as much time as he needs to come back and be fresh to play for us and to relish playing rugby again.
“We will make sensible decisions on an individual basis on what is right for the player and the club, but we’ll be putting strong teams out every week.”
Eddie Jones avoids World Cup questions:
Latest Comments
Skelton may be brought back for the Wallabies so that would be the only reason that may hinder Wilson. Easily the form, most skilful and game IQ of any Oz 8. Valentini’s best and favourite position is 6, but lineouts may be an issue with Skelton, Valentini and Wilson. Will be interesting what Schmidt goes for but for me Wilson should be picked on form. Schmidt rewards work rate, skill and consistency. All that glitters every so often won’t be in contention. Greely is one of those players that has a knack of making the right decision. A coach is going to love him because he knows week in week out he’s going to get the job done. The second try Greely wasn’t the guy who made the initial break it was Flook, Greely was at the bottom of the ruck when Flook was off along the sideline. Greely got up and made the effort to catch up with play but also read the play nicely and hit the pass from Campbell at pace and then held the pass beautifully to Ryan.
Go to commentsSharks deserved to be far further back by the last quarter. Their tackling was awful, their set pieces were disappointing, their defensive organization was poor (especially on the Kok side of the D line), they kept making unnecessary errors, and they never looked like cracking the Clermont defense during those first 60m. Masuku kept them in touch, with some help from the Clermont generosity on penalty opportunities. Agree with the writer of this article. It was belligerence, and ability to raise their pressure game just enough, that turned the last quarter into a Bok-style shutout. Clermont have a reputation of not playing the full 80m, and there was a bit of that for sure. But, quite often when the intensity of a team drops off in the last quarter credit is due to the opponent for tiring them out. At 60m, with the Kok try, you thought that just maybe the game was on. At 70m, with the Mapimpi contribution, one felt that Clermont were fading, while facing a team that would maintain the pressure game through the final whistle. Good win in the end, but the Sharks are still playing way below their potential. And with their resources, and a coach that has had enough time to figure things out, they are running out of excuses.
Go to comments