Tuisue banned after tackle he claimed was 'at most a yellow card'
Fiji back-rower Albert Tuisue has paid a heavy price for the tackle he claimed merited no more than a yellow card versus Ireland last Saturday. The Gloucester forward was red-carded by French referee Mathieu Raynal following his second-half collision with Joe Carbery in Dublin and he will now miss four matches.
A statement read: “Fiji back row Albert Tuisue appeared before an independent judicial committee via video link having received a red card for an act of foul play contrary to law 9.13 in Fiji’s international match against Ireland on November 12.
“The independent disciplinary committee - chaired by Philippe Cavalieros (France) and joined by former internationals Stefan Terblanche (South Africa) and Leon Lloyd (England) - heard the case, considering all the available evidence, including multiple broadcast angles and submissions from the player and his representative.
“The player denied that he had committed an act of foul play worthy of a red card, but admitted that the act was worthy of at most a yellow card. Having reviewed all the evidence, the committee noted that the player had under the applicable regulation the burden of proving that a red card was not warranted.
“On the basis of the available evidence, notably the footage of the incident, the disciplinary committee was not satisfied that the player met his burden of proof in this respect and notably considered that there was some degree of danger under the head contact process arising out of the contact with the head of the victim player.
“The committee also considered that the player had not met his burden of proof in applying mitigating factors to the incident. On that basis, the committee applied World Rugby’s mandatory minimum mid-range entry point for foul play resulting in contact with the head. This resulted in a starting point of a six-week suspension.
“Having acknowledged mitigating factors, including the player’s conduct during the hearing and taking into account his disciplinary record, the committee reduced the six-week entry point by two weeks, resulting in a sanction of four weeks (to be served as follows given the player’s upcoming schedule):
- French Barbarians vs Fiji, November 20, Stade Pierre Mauroy;
- Three remaining matches to be confirmed.
“The player may apply to take part in the coaching intervention programme to substitute the final match of his sanction for a coaching intervention aimed at modifying specific techniques and technical issues that contributed to the foul play.”
Latest Comments
Nah, that just needs some more variation. Chip kicks, grubber stabs, all those. Will Jordan showed a pretty good reason why the rush was bad for his link up with BB.
If you have an overlap on a rush defense, they naturally cover out and out and leave a huge gap near the ruck.
It also helps if both teams play the same rules. ARs set the offside line 1m past where the last mans feet were😅
Go to commentsYeah nar, should work for sure. I was just asking why would you do it that way?
It could be achieved by outsourcing all your IP and players to New Zealand, Japan, and America, with a big Super competition between those countries raking it in with all of Australia's best talent to help them at a club level. When there is enough of a following and players coming through internally, and from other international countries (starting out like Australia/without a pro scene), for these high profile clubs to compete without a heavy australian base, then RA could use all the money they'd saved over the decades to turn things around at home and fund 4 super sides of their own that would be good enough to compete.
That sounds like a great model to reset the game in Aus. Take a couple of decades to invest in youth and community networks before trying to become professional again. I just suggest most aussies would be a bit more optimistic they can make it work without the two decades without any pro club rugby bit.
Go to comments