Ulster player banned after accepting 'his opponent’s head had hit the ground'
Matthew Rea of Ulster Rugby faced a Disciplinary Hearing today and has been banned as a result.
A Disciplinary Committee met in Edinburgh to consider the red-card decision against Rea (No 6) of Ulster Rugby which occurred against Connacht Rugby on Friday, October 5, 2018.
The player was shown a red card by referee Andrew Brace under Law 9.17 – A player must not tackle, charge, pull, push or grasp an opponent whose feet are off the ground.
The incident occurred in the 41st minute of the Guinness PRO14 Round 6 fixture at Kingspan Stadium (Belfast) when the referee deemed the player to have committed an act of foul play against an opponent (No 23, Cian Kelleher).
The player accepted that he had committed an act of foul play but did not accept that it warranted a red card.
The Disciplinary Committee, comprising of Pamela Woodman (Chair), Kathrine Mackie and Ian Douglas (all Scotland), concluded that the player had committed an act of foul play, that that act of foul play warranted a red card and so the referee’s decision to issue the red card was not wrong.
The player had accepted that his opponent’s head had hit the ground as a consequence of the incident. In determining entry point, the Committee took into account the direction from World Rugby that "any act of foul play which results in contact with the head shall result in at least a mid-range sanction" and concluded that a mid-range entry point (of eight weeks) was appropriate.
The Committee took into account that there were no aggravating factors, the player’s clean disciplinary record and other mitigating factors and applied full mitigation of 50 per cent, meaning that the player is free to play on Monday, November 5, 2018.
He has been banned for four weeks.
The player was reminded of his right to appeal.
Latest Comments
I didn't mean to sound down on Dmac. Just looking hard at the bench sub's role of providing impact. I don't think he can do that at 15, and the bench is not really about injury cover anymore (you need to maximise it's use more than that).
He's my first choice of any New Zealander for the 10 jersey with the All Blacks.
Go to commentsAgreed. And I don't have much more to say on it, but I had been having one thought that sprang to mind at the tail of this discussion, and that is that it's not all about Razor.
It's not about any coach being "right". I think a lot of selections can become defense and while it doesn't really apply here I really enjoyed that Andy Farrell just gave into the public demands and changed out his team for the change that had been asked for. Like why not? This is the countries team, keep them engaged. The whole reason i've only just finished watching the game was because I wasn't interested in watching any of the selected players against a team like Italy (still actually enjoyed the first half with the contest Italy made of it).
Faz leap frogs a younger half back into start. He hands the golden child the game over July's golden child. He gives an old winger a go, a new flanker and hooker. None of them really did any good, certainly not enough to suggest they should have been promoted above others, but who cares? You won, and you gave the country what they wanted, that's all that matters after all. It's for the country, not the one in charge who thinks they have to have their own pied piper tune playing.
Go to comments