1
Victor Matfield responds to Rieko Ioane's 'Super Rugby title above a World Cup' remark
By Ned Lester
All Blacks star Rieko Ioane made headlines following the Blues' Super Rugby Pacific final win over the Chiefs last weekend by saying the Super Rugby title means more to him than a World Cup.
The statement inevitably provoked a strong response online, with some fans suggesting the star centre was deflecting from his disappointment over the World Cup final loss in France last year.
However, the full quote from Ioane puts the conversation into context.
“I put a Super Rugby title above a World Cup, because of how much I love this city, how much I love this club, how much I’ve admired this club,” he told media after the final.
The rugby world has been Ioane's oyster since emerging as a teenage star. The now 27-year-old became the eighth youngest All Black debutant in 2016, running out for the first time against Italy at the age of 19.
Crediting his development as a player to the local system, Ioane's comments can be seen as less World Cup snubbing and more pride in his region.
A former Super Rugby winner and 2007 world champion has since come out in partial agreement with Ioane.
Springbok great Victor Matfield responded to the All Black's comments, reflecting on his time in the competition.
"Ioane this week said a Super Rugby title means more to him than a World Cup," Matfield began on SuperSport's Final Whistle Present Side Entry.
"When we were playing in it and we had all our best players playing for South African franchises, New Zealand had all their best, Australia had all their best, it was by far the best competition in the world.
"I really believe it's a tougher competition to win than a World Cup, because there you had to win 10 of our 12 games, then, you play against the best teams in the semi and the final, so you had to be at the top of your game for a very long time.
"In a World Cup, you probably need three good games. Even in the Champions Cup, it's a top competition because of top teams, but you only have to play two, three good games.
"Super Rugby, you were playing against 10 of the best teams in the world and you had to perform week in, and week out.
"I miss it a lot, but we're in a good space as well now."
Matfield also shared his thoughts on the long-running debate over the Springboks leaving The Rugby Championship for the Six Nations, saying while there are undeniable benefits for the Springboks up north, it's not worth leaving their southern hemisphere rivals.
"I would like to stay in the southern hemisphere. Financially, it would probably make more sense to go up north, but you have to play the All Blacks every year, you have to play Australia - yes, Australia are in a difficult time but they will bounce back, and they will be competitive again - and Argentina have shown they are a top six nation most of the time.
"For us, playing club rugby up north but staying in the south, I prefer it. I think playing the All Blacks, playing Australia, we need that as well because that is a different challenge."
Trending on RugbyPass
2
South Africa vs England player ratings | 2024 Autumn Nations Series
3
All Blacks player ratings vs France
4
Netherlands serve up Tier 2 shock as another World Cup side slayed
5
Latest Comments
At least he no longer writes articles related to the All Blacks. The suggestion with these ratings is that the ABs have a lot more left in the tank... Which is nonsense, this was a nail biter of a test of the highest standard and both sides we're going at it hammer and tongs. As is often the case in rugby, the team that managed to score the most tries won.
Go to commentsWho, the ABs? Oh for sure, they punched above their weight in that cup, but also had got a lot better than anyone had thought they could (except perhaps SAn's) well out from the WC (to the point where you were disappointed not to win it). Then they've probably done the most post analyzing of their RWCs in the past, due to all their failures, they knew how to maximize their itinerary and that first game against France was of less importance than any one off test was against. At least a test like this weekends had meaning, even if it's not surrounded by any overarching point. That first match in the RWC though, along with the Ireland v SA game, were totally meaningless. Everyone already knew they were only going to be up against each other, and that's why NZ were only at around 70% during it.
So you're quite right, it was pointless to make as much out of it as this author did. The same pretty much goes for 2 years prior as well, because that's obviously before the above happened. NZ were at least trying very hard in that game, and although it needed some Ntamack magic at the end, France looked pretty comfortable, or should I say, NZ very poor. That picture obviously turned around this year, but still with that fabulous French flair scoring some crazy tries to win it again.
Go to comments