Video - Piers Morgan pulls apart alarmist anti-rugby Professor's argument on live television
After fresh calls in the UK this week for tackling to banned in the age grade rugby, an unlikely hero has come to the defense of rugby.
Serial alarmist Professor Allyson Pollock has argued continually over the last number of years to remove tackling from rugby due what she perceives as the undue dangers there-in.
However controversial British broadcaster and media figure Piers Morgan has lept to the defence of the game , on morning television no less.
Supported by Maggie Alphonsi, former England rugby player, Morgan challenges her calls for the ban.
Other figures have pointed out the gapping holes in Professor Pollock's arguments.
In a statement this week World Rugby have said of Prof Pollock: “The continual claims made by Pollock are not based on like-for-like injury statistics and her extreme and alarmist conclusions are simply not supported by the data. It is well documented that, for most sports, injury rates increase with age, but the quoted research mixes 9-12 with 18-20 age groups.”
Latest Comments
They bend the rules for pre-existing All Blacks, provided you've signed for a NZ franchise the following year.
Go to commentsUnder Rassie it is 5 wins for ABs, 1 draw, and 7 wins for the Boks. Of those games, only 3 were played in NZ, and 5 played in SA, and 5 on neutral ground.
Of the 3 played in NZ, the ABs only lost once. Of the games played in SA, SBs are 5-2, and on neutral ground its 3-2 to the Boks.
Seems pretty even to me, considering this is the greatest Boks team ever (I still think 2007 was better).
If Rassie wins, this will be the best Boks team ever, but the ABs aren't scared of a team who barely scrape wins against a reforming ABs team, and lost to an undercooked Irish side twice last year.
I predict a 7+ point win, leading by 13+ at halftime.
Go to comments