1
Wallabies injuries, losses, worries grow
By AAP
Second best in all areas by their own admission, the Wallabies must now regroup from another Eden Park shellacking to take on the might of European rugby.
Australia were belted 40-14 in Auckland on Saturday night and face a brutal examination of their failings.
"I thought our preparation was excellent ... and the All Blacks shaded us everywhere," coach Dave Rennie admitted.
It might have been worse for the Wallabies, down 32-0 with 20 minutes remaining, putting the All Blacks within a converted try of the biggest trans-Tasman margin in 119 years of competition.
Avoiding that ignominy is hardly a face-saver, and Rennie knows it.
Asked to outline the positives from their latest trip to Eden Park - their 23rd straight loss to the All Blacks at the dreaded venue in 36 years - Rennie deferred.
"I'll tell you in about two or three days when I look through that," he said.
"We tried to squeeze them and stress them but we weren't able to."
Rennie's winning record in three years at the helm now stands at 38 per cent.
With Australia ranked ninth in the world, Rennie has a month to recalibrate for a European tour taking in Scotland, France, Italy, Ireland and Wales.
He will make that trip without a wealth of talent and experience.
Marika Koroibete is unavailable, due back in Japan on club duty.
Bernard Foley, who Rennie said was knocked out in Saturday's defeat, may join him, though the Wallabies are negotiating with Kubota Spears to keep him on.
Lalakai Foketi suffered a shoulder injury at Eden Park and won't play again this year, joining Samu Kerevi, Quade Cooper, Izaia Perese and Rob Leota in the long-term injury ward.
Rennie ruled out changes in his fitness and conditioning team, calling them "some of the best of the world", blaming injuries on collisions.
It is unclear whether Scott Sio, who damaged a hamstring in last week's 39-37 loss in Melbourne, will recover; M ichael Hooper is a "wait and see" after his personal leave, and Tom Banks is likely, though not certain, to return.
Wallabies fans might think those matches, especially against world No.1 Ireland and No.2 France could get ugly.
Rennie has another word for the daunting prospect.
"Exciting, hey" he said.
"That's why we're doing it ... it's a tough tour.
"When you play a lot of footy with a lot of young men, the more we play the better heading into a World Cup year."
Captain James Slipper says he holds "plenty of hope" for the France-hosted tournament.
"The beauty of the last three years is we've been able to blood a fair few Wallabies and they'll just continue to grow," he said.
"But the biggest aspect we need to improve on is the consistency. We manage to put in a good performance and then back it up with a poor one.
"We can't do that at a World Cup but the bottom line is we're confident. We've just got to build some momentum and keep getting better."
Trending on RugbyPass
2
Wallaroos captain reflects on Black Ferns’ success with sevens stars
3
Springboks flyhalf's latest injury worry
4
Initial Immanuel Feyi-Waboso injury update does not sound promising
5
Latest Comments
The boy needs to bulk up if wants to play 10 or 11 to handle those hits, otherwise he could always make a brilliant reserve for the wings if he stays away from the stretcher.
Go to commentsIn another recent article I tried to argue for a few key concept changes for EPCR which I think could light the game up in the North.
First, I can't remember who pointed out the obvious elephant in the room (a SA'n poster?), it's a terrible time to play rugby in the NH, and especially your pinnacle tournament. It's been terrible watching with seemingly all the games I wanted to watch being in the dark, hardly able to see what was going on. The Aviva was the only stadium I saw that had lights that could handle the miserable rain. If the global appeal is there, they could do a lot better having day games.
They other primary idea I thuoght would benefit EPCR most, was more content. The Prem could do with it and the Top14 could do with something more important than their own league, so they aren't under so much pressure to sell games. The quality over quantity approach.
Trim it down to two 16 team EPCR competitions, and introduce a third for playing amongst the T2 sides, or the bottom clubs in each league should simply be working on being better during the EPCR.
Champions Cup is made up of league best 15 teams, + 1, the Challenge Cup winner. Without a reason not to, I'd distribute it evenly based on each leauge, dividing into thirds and rounded up, 6 URC 5 Top14 4 English. Each winner (all four) is #1 rank and I'd have a seeding round or two for the other 12 to determine their own brackets for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. I'd then hold a 6 game pool, home and away, with consecutive of each for those games that involve SA'n teams. Preferrably I'd have a regional thing were all SA'n teams were in the same pool but that's a bit complex for this simple idea.
That pool round further finalises the seeding for knockout round of 16. So #1 pool has essentially duked it out for finals seeding already (better venue planning), and to see who they go up against 16, 15,etc etc. Actually I think I might prefer a single pool round for seeding, and introduce the home and away for Ro16, quarters, and semis (stuffs up venue hire). General idea to produce the most competitive matches possible until the random knockout phase, and fix the random lottery of which two teams get ranked higher after pool play, and also keep the system identical for the Challenge Cup so everthing is succinct. Top T2 side promoted from last year to make 16 in Challenge Cup
Go to comments