Wallabies reject 'us against the world' mentality
The view from two former All Blacks that Australia's siege mentality approach to the Rugby World Cup will backfire has been rejected by the Wallabies.
In fact, inside centre Matt To'omua says such an attitude doesn't even exist despite the outspoken antics of his coach Michael Cheika.
A series of rulings against Australia from match officials and the judiciary have been publicly challenged by Cheika through the first two rounds of the tournament, at one point saying it felt like "us against everyone else" at the tournament.
Richard Kahui and Andy Ellis, both members of New Zealand's 2011 World Cup winning squad, believe Cheika has created a negative vibe which will permeate down to the players.
"I see Cheik and I feel for him because he's obviously a man under pressure. It's not just this World Cup, it's been building the last 2-3 years," Kahui told The Breakdown television show.
"(But) the way that he's going about talking about referees and things, I just wonder how much that influences the players.
"It creates a negative environment and it's like a snowball. It starts to build."
Ellis believed the Wallabies had been "robbed" by some calls, particularly those made during Sunday's loss to Wales.
However, the former halfback was critical of what was clearly a Cheika tactic to circle the wagons.
"I've heard the language being used - 'Oh, it's them against us' - and I don't think that's healthy in a camp."
To'omua insisted there was no such sentiment behind the green and gold doors, and was keen to also shed any label of whingeing Wallabies.
"I wouldn't say that's the feeling within camp in the sense that we're thinking everyone is against us," he said.
"I don't think (poor officiating) has had a direct impact or effect on the result of the game which is the main thing.
"If it was a last-minute thing we might have felt hard-done-by but we lost on the weekend because we were the worst of the two teams."
Accomplished New Zealand referee Glen Jackson sided with his compatriots, believing Cheika had overplayed his hand with the ongoing criticism.
Jackson wondered if the negativity had impacted on Wallabies skipper Michael Hooper, whose frustration came close to boiling over in the direction of French referee Romain Poite during the Welsh defeat.
"He's a great captain and normally pretty well-controlled but in that game, there might have been a bit of frustration through the camp and then his dealing with the referee in this game, he probably let himself down a little bit."
- AAP
Former All Blacks coach John Hart has slammed the TMOs at the Rugby World Cup:
Latest Comments
Actually the era defining moment came a few years earlier. February 2002 to be precise, when Michael D Higgins as finance minister at the time introduced his sports persons tax relief bill to the dial. As the politicians of the day stated “It seems to be another daft K Club frolic born in Kildare amongst the well-paid professional jockeys with whom the Minister plays golf” and that the scheme represented “a savage uncaring vision of Ireland and one that should be condemned”. The irfu and Leinster would be nowhere near the position they are in today without this key component of the finances.
Go to commentsIt is crystal clear that people who make such threats on line should be tried and imprisoned. Those with responsibility in social media companies who don’t facilitate this should be convicted. In real life, I have free speech to approach someone like Reinach and verbally threaten him. I am risking a conviction or a slap but I could do it. In the old days, If someone anonymously threatened someone by letter the police would ask and use evidence from the postal system. Unlike the Post, social media companies have complete instant and legal access to the content in social media. They make money from the data, billions. Yet, they turn a blind eye to terrorism, Nazi-ism and industrial levels of threats against individuals including their address and childrens schools being published online all from ananoymous accounts not real speech. They claim free speech. The fault is with the perps but also social media companies who think anonymous personas posting death threats constitutes free speech.
Go to comments