Wallabies veteran faces uncertain future ahead of potentially final test this weekend
It says a lot about the form of veteran lock Rob Simmons that his Wallabies teammates are not thinking about his send-off.
The Argentina Tri Nations test on Saturday night is likely to be Simmons' 106th and last appearance for Australia, with the 31-year-old signing to play with London Irish.
But his Wallabies cohort have little planned by way of a farewell, with fellow lock Matt Philip saying he expected to see Simmons turning out in the Australian gold again.
"We haven't spoken about it," Philip said of Simmons' departure.
"Rob's played 106 test matches but some of the last couple of ones have been his best so I wouldn't be surprised if he's back."
Despite his shift overseas, Simmons could still be selected for Australia, fulfilling 'Giteau's Law' of having a minimum of 60 test caps, which is a requirement for players not playing Super Rugby.
There was an addendum for 2020 to allow for two overseas-based players who did not reach this mark but lock Rory Arnold appeared to be the only player in consideration before he broke his arm.
It is unclear if the ruling will continue next year, with the preference of Wallabies coach Dave Rennie to use local players.
Rennie said Simmons, who played nine seasons with Queensland before shifting to NSW for a further three, had been a "massive contributor".
"Obviously lock's been a position we've been pretty thin in so his experience ... and he's made good shifts in his game, really worked hard around his physicality and tackle, clean and carry," Rennie said.
"It's great to see a guy who has played 100 tests can still try and grow his game, so who knows (if he will play again)?"
Simmons said he is not preparing as if Saturday will be his last international game, and that he would always be available to the Wallabies if required.
With or without him, Simmons feels the side can look forward to a bright future.
"The detail in our game has gone to a new level and the way the group has bonded together in the last 12 months ... it comes down to the connections you have with each other on the field and how much you're willing to play for each other.
"This is one of the strongest groups I've felt that (with)."
Latest Comments
There's no easy fix here. From a geography standpoint, South Africa is kind of on an island alone in the rugby world, much like Argentina.
They don't have enough talent to have a top tier domestic league of their own, and it won't support the union financially. Best case you could hope for would be the five extant franchises (including Cheetahs) and perhaps a team from Namimbia. Gives you a 6 team league, that's not enough. Plus again, it's just not financially sustainable either.
At the same time, it's not really great for them to be involved in either the European or the Pacific rugby set up. That said, as bad as the travel is, at least Europe makes more sense from a time zone perspective. I still think it's the least bad option. Also has done wonders for the URC.
I don't think though, that it makes very much sense to have 4 teams from the URC excluded from European qualification. Not to mention, being able to compete in the Champions Cup was a big draw for the South African clubs anyway.
So yeah, I don't really see a change that makes more sense than the less than ideal situation that already exists.
Go to commentsMoriaty refused to play for wales also he’s injured, France’s is being coy about wales, North in the dark but Sam David and jerad are you joking their not good enough
Go to comments