Warburton explains why pro game must be prioritised over grassroots

Former Wales captain Sam Warburton has elaborated on his stance on how the Welsh Rugby Union should spend their resources.
The 35-year-old recently explained on the BBC why he thinks the WRU should prioritise spending on the professional teams rather than grassroots rugby as it will generate more interest in the game.
As a guest on RPTV's The Big Jim Show recently, the former British & Irish Lions captain expanded on those views, drawing inspiration from the NFL and the Premier League and how the top teams spend their money.
While Warburton maintains that grassroots rugby should not be neglected, he said the focus should be on building "iconic teams" which will generate longterm success.
"Maybe naive people will say 'you've got to invest in grassroots,'" he said.
"I'm like 'really?' Investing in four or five-year-olds now is going to change the game? No.
"You can try and encourage me to do something, but if I'm not seeing something aspirational at the very top, I'm going to be like 'what's the point? Why am I going to bother with this?'
"I'm not saying you neglect grassroots, there should always be a proportion of your turnover which goes to grassroots or goes to community projects.
"You can go to as many schools as you want, they ain't going to care if there's no product to look up to.
"That's why I think with Welsh rugby, if you've got a successful national team and you've got successful regions, guess what, all the youngsters watching are going to think 'this is a pretty sexy sport to play and I want to be that next icon and role model, that's going to be me.'
"That's what inspired me when I was growing up. There were good Cardiff teams when Cardiff were in the European Cup final in the late '90s, Wales won a Grand Slam in '05, I was like 'I want to be that guy.'
"If you haven't got that success, the bottom of your pyramid is going to get much smaller. So when people think it goes bottom-up, you actually reverse it, it comes top-down.
"I always think you've got to invest in your professional game first and foremost. Look at England in '03, when they won the World Cup, I bet you because they won the World Cup engagement in rugby clubs around the country would have been flying and interest would have been flying. How many kids were probably cupping their hands, kicking goals in their local parks because they wanted to be Jonny Wilkinson.
"You've got to build these stars, build these iconic teams, and naturally the interest will follow.
"I've only got a small business now, but what's the one thing you need to focus on? The product. If the product's not good, people ain't going to buy it. You've got to focus on the product, and it rugby that's the professional game."
Latest Comments
Lakai? Hell no, Kirifi is the like for like. I could never imagine Lakai throwing a dummy like Ardie, his had’s and offload are probably his best asset. Still a good option to replace Ardies function within the group. Happy for that to phase in slowly over the next two years.
Kirifi is someone demanding attention as Ardie’s/the teams go to back up option though. Like with you’re Kaino ref though, happy for that to reverse back again if Lakai simply starts outperforming him again. The Kaino role has really been filled by Cane (perhaps because they didn’t find a replacement) and the 6’s that have been used are more like a Read/Jones/Flavell/Fifita.
I really do like the idea of that rock being a little bigger and a little tougher than Cane though. Miracle looks like that guy, and there are few possible young kiwis coming through too. Barrett over Vaa’i for me, he just has a little of the mongrol and flair you also want.
Go to commentsI think you have gone in the wrong direction here Nick. I think you need to delve down into the rules etc around Moana Pacifica’s selection policies and then you need to understand that a lot of KIWI BORN rugby players have PI heritage. It appears ok for the 4 home nations to pillage NZ born players constantly without retribution but you want to question whether NZ BORN players should be eligible for NZ? Seems a real agenda in there.
Go back and look at the actual Aims and agenda for MP becoming a entity and you see lots of things enshrined in policy that you arnt mentioning here. EG there is an allowance for a percentage of MP to be NZ eligible. This was done so MP could actually become competitive. Lets be real. If it wasnt this way then MP would not be competitive.
There also seems to be some sort of claim ( mainly from the NH ) that NZ is “cashing in” on MP, which , quite frankly is a major error. Are you aware of how much MP costs NZR Financially?
39 NZ born rugby players played at the last world cup for Samoa or Tonga. PLUS plenty for Scotland, England, Ireland and Wales.
Taumoefolau is a BORN AND BRED NZer. However I very strongly doubt he will be an AB, but who do you believe he should be allowed to play for? Levi Aumua is ALSO a born and bred Kiwi.
Aumua was eligible to represent Samoa and Fiji for the Pacific Nations Cup in July that year but ended up playing for neither. He IS eligible for his nation of Birth too Nick
He is a Kiwi. Are you saying an NZ born, raised Kiwi cant play for NZ now?
Sorry Nick Kiwi born and bred actually qualify for NZ.
Go to comments