'We talk probably every second week' - Hansen gives insight into relationship with Jones
New Zealand head coach Steve Hansen has revealed a remarkably close relationship that he has with his England counterpart Eddie Jones.
The two men will do battle at Twickenham on Saturday, but it appears it will be as friends and not as enemies.
“We usually talk either by text or by phone, probably every second week. It’s always good to have other people who are doing a similar role to yourself to be able to talk to."
"First and foremost you’ve got to have some form of relationship that allows you to get on with each other. You don’t ring people up you don’t like, just because they are doing the same job as you. So it probably indicates I like him and he might like me; I don’t know.
“The bottom line is we talk, our wives talk, and that’s not surprising. I think he’s a good bloke.
Continue reading below...
Watch: Eddie Jones speaks to RugbyPass ahead of All Blacks test
2018 has been largely a year to forget for England, they began with two wins in the Six Nations, but three defeats followed and a fifth-placed finish. A 2-1 series defeat to the Springboks in June saw questions raised in some quarters over Jones' future.
“The only people that don’t understand what it’s like to be a head coach of an international team are the people who’ve never been one. There’s a lot of pressure there, all the time, whether you’re winning or losing. It comes just in a different wrapper.
“And the expectations when you coach a top side like England are, you’re expected to win, and play well. Eddie more than anybody understands that. So he’s not too bothered by it. People who get excited by it are the people that have to write the stories, and sell the newspapers.
“The bottom line is he’ll be going about doing his job like he always does. And looking from afar, I think he’s doing a pretty good job.
England picked up a 12-11 win over the South Africa to open their November campaign and Hansen is not underestimating the challenge his All Blacks will face.
“He’s got a tremendous work ethic, Eddie; he does a lot of homework and through that he will have identified some areas he’ll want to try to target. Does that give him any better idea how to beat us than anyone else? Maybe. But there’s a lot of good coaches out there.
“He’s had some success against New Zealand in the past, but hopefully he doesn’t get any on Saturday.
“To win a Test match against a good opponent you’ve got to do your homework and things have to fall your way a little bit.
“You’re the guys calling him bullish, I’m just saying he’s just trying to do the right thing for his team.
“Does it mean we’ve got to be on guard against England? obviously. It wouldn’t matter if he were bullish or not.
“They are a good rugby team. They won 18 in a row, only one other side in the world has ever done that. So it makes them a good side.”
You may also like: Join RugbyPass employee of the month runner-up Sam Smith as he embarks on an epic journey across Europe to track down some of the finest Kiwi talent plying their trade in the Northern Hemisphere.
Latest Comments
Skelton may be brought back for the Wallabies so that would be the only reason that may hinder Wilson. Easily the form, most skilful and game IQ of any Oz 8. Valentini’s best and favourite position is 6, but lineouts may be an issue with Skelton, Valentini and Wilson. Will be interesting what Schmidt goes for but for me Wilson should be picked on form. Schmidt rewards work rate, skill and consistency. All that glitters every so often won’t be in contention. Greely is one of those players that has a knack of making the right decision. A coach is going to love him because he knows week in week out he’s going to get the job done. The second try Greely wasn’t the guy who made the initial break it was Flook, Greely was at the bottom of the ruck when Flook was off along the sideline. Greely got up and made the effort to catch up with play but also read the play nicely and hit the pass from Campbell at pace and then held the pass beautifully to Ryan.
Go to commentsSharks deserved to be far further back by the last quarter. Their tackling was awful, their set pieces were disappointing, their defensive organization was poor (especially on the Kok side of the D line), they kept making unnecessary errors, and they never looked like cracking the Clermont defense during those first 60m. Masuku kept them in touch, with some help from the Clermont generosity on penalty opportunities. Agree with the writer of this article. It was belligerence, and ability to raise their pressure game just enough, that turned the last quarter into a Bok-style shutout. Clermont have a reputation of not playing the full 80m, and there was a bit of that for sure. But, quite often when the intensity of a team drops off in the last quarter credit is due to the opponent for tiring them out. At 60m, with the Kok try, you thought that just maybe the game was on. At 70m, with the Mapimpi contribution, one felt that Clermont were fading, while facing a team that would maintain the pressure game through the final whistle. Good win in the end, but the Sharks are still playing way below their potential. And with their resources, and a coach that has had enough time to figure things out, they are running out of excuses.
Go to comments