'We want to grow his influence in our team': McKenzie to start at fullback
Damian McKenzie is continuing his push for a spot in the matchday 23 come knockout time at the World Cup, this time having been named to start at fullback against Uruguay.
Having played most of his World Cup minutes to date at first five-eighth, McKenzie's versatility could help land him the 22 or 23 jersey moving forward. But, with two playmakers already in the starting unit, it's most likely going to be form that decides his involvement if the All Blacks do progress.
The partnership of Mckenzie at 15 and Richie Mo'unga at 10 has been only lightly tested by the All Blacks so far, but having squared off in the Super Rugby Pacific final earlier in the year, the duo are arguably the most in-form playmakers New Zealand has to offer.
The dual playmaker model isn't without it's challenges so in naming a new combination for the must-win match, Ian Foster is placing his trust in McKenzie to quickly find his feet in the new role.
"Well, he's always been a 10-15 for us," Foster told reporters. "So it's keeping that combination between our 10 and 15 going well.
"We were really pleased with Damian last week and we want to grow his influence in our team and we think this is a good opportunity for him to do that. And Beaudie (Barrett) can be that calm head coming off the bench if we end up moving Damian into 10 later on.
"It's to keep growing the combinations we think are working well for us. It also means it's another continuity-type game for Will (Jordan). He's played the first game, missed the next one and another couple of games in a row will be really positive for him."
Jordan was another candidate for the fullback position but Foster has remained resolute in his view that the 25-year-old is better suited to the wing at this point in time.
The shift in position won't phase McKenzie, who has plenty of experience in the No 15 jersey - although not recently.
"It's a little bit different from what I've been playing this year," McKenzie said. "It's a role I am familiar with though. Particularly our role in the All Blacks as a 10, we find ourselves back in the backfield quite often.
"For me, it's great to have an opportunity to have a bit more freedom at full-back and help out Richie (Mo'unga) where I can."
Heading into the tournament, the All Blacks were trending upwards having gone undefeated in The Rugby Championship and Bledisloe Cup. The World Rugby No 1 ranking was within reach as the team ran out onto the Twickenham field to face the Springboks in a World Cup warm up.
Famously, that Test was lost by a record margin and so too was the Rugby World Cup's opening match against France.
This is, however, a long tournament and there is time for improvements to be made - somtheing McKenzie made a point of addressing ahead of the Uruguay clash.
"We've grown really well from our first game against France and moving forward. We had a good performance against Namibia and then Italy last weekend was great as well.
"I think our attack is growing really well. From numbers 1-15 we are all putting up our hands where we need to in terms of our phase stuff and our attack. And we know we can definitely get better still."
Latest Comments
Generally disagree with what? The possibility that they would get whitewashed, or the idea they shouldn't gain access until they're good enough?
I think the first is a fairly irrelevant view, decide on the second and then worry about the first. Personally I'd have had them in a third lvl comp with all the bottom dwellers of the leagues. I liked the idea of those league clubs resting their best players, and so being able to lift their standards in the league, though, so not against the idea that T2 sides go straight into Challenge Cup, but that will be a higher level with smaller comps and I think a bit too much for them (not having followed any of their games/performances mind you).
fl's idea, if I can speak for him to speed things up, was for it to be semifinalists first, Champions Cup (any that somehow didn't make a league semi), then Challenge's semi finalists (which would most certainly have been outside their league semi's you'd think), then perhaps the quarter finalists of each in the same manner. I don't think he was suggesting whoever next performed best in Europe but didn't make those knockouts (like those round of 16 losers), I doubt that would ever happen.
The problem I mainly saw with his idea (much the same as you see, that league finish is a better indicator) is that you could have one of the best candidates lose in the quarters to the eventual champions, and so miss out for someone who got an easier ride, and also finished lower in the league, perhaps in their own league, and who you beat everytime.
Go to commentsIt was an odd tournament full of sides cobbled together and given strange names..as well as clearly national sides. It was for this reason hard to follow.
Go to comments