Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Why All Blacks boss Ian Foster doesn't believe his side were second-best to the Wallabies

(Photo by Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)

Beaten in almost every statistical division, All Blacks coach Ian Foster won’t concede they were second-best to the Wallabies in the opening Bledisloe Cup test.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 16-16 draw in Wellington was an instant classic, Australia bringing the kind of intensity missing from previous outings in New Zealand.

The Wallabies bested the All Blacks in metres gained (525-483), carries (153-91), and passes (190-122).

Video Spacer

All Blacks coach Ian Foster and captain Sam Cane speak to media

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 0:00
 
1x
    • Chapters
    • descriptions off, selected
    • captions off, selected
      Video Spacer

      All Blacks coach Ian Foster and captain Sam Cane speak to media

      They also conceded fewer turnovers (20-12) and were forced into fewer tackles (202-105).

      Dave Rennie’s side couldn’t make that count where it mattered; on the scoreboard.

      From the opening whistle, the Wallabies were up for the contest and were unfortunate to go behind on nine minutes through Jordie Barrett’s opening try.

      Foster said the early scoreboard advantage – which the All Blacks held until late in the contest – flavoured the statistics and Australia weren’t the better side.

      “I’m not a great believer that possession is the all-important stat,” he said.

      “We striked and scored a try and it was really well executed but we were only holding the ball for 20 seconds.

      ADVERTISEMENT

      “So it’s not always a great indicator but I think it swung too far in their way.”

      The contest has sparked hopes for a closely fought Bledisloe Cup, though Foster – a long term All Blacks assistant – doesn’t share them.

      https://www.instagram.com/tv/CGMj6XsA3V-/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

      “I kind of liked it the way it was,” Foster said, referring to the 17 straight Kiwi wins, many with him involved.

      After the match, Foster invited the Wallabies, including captain Michael Hooper on the occasion of his 100th test, into the All Blacks changerooms.

      “We had a great time,” he said.

      “We presented something to Michael on his 100th Test match. Players themselves, they know everything that goes into that.

      ADVERTISEMENT

      “There was a great feeling in the sheds afterwards and there’s a lot of mutual respect there … we want this to be the way these two countries behave.”

      The four-test series move s now to Eden Park, where New Zealand holds a formidable record.

      The All Blacks are unbeaten in 43 matches at the Auckland stadium dating back to 1994.

      “I don’t know if I’m allowed to say this but it has always felt like our home ground,” he said.

      “There’s always been a lot of big tests, so it’s got a lot of history.

      “Does it help us beyond that? It doesn’t help us at all.

      “What’s going to do the business next weekend is this All Blacks team, learning from a 16-all draw, taking the good stuff out … and growing some other parts of our game.”

      ADVERTISEMENT

      KOKO Show | July 22nd | Full Throttle with Brisbane Test Review and Melbourne Preview

      New Zealand v South Africa | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

      USA vs England | Men's International | Full Match Replay

      France v Argentina | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

      Lions Share | Episode 4

      Zimbabwe vs Namibia | Rugby Africa Cup Final | Full Match Replay

      USA vs Fiji | Women's International | Full Match Replay

      Tattoos & Rugby: Why are tattoos so popular with sportspeople? | Amber Schonert | Rugby Rising Locker Room Season 2

      Trending on RugbyPass

      Comments

      0 Comments
      Be the first to comment...

      Join free and tell us what you really think!

      Sign up for free
      ADVERTISEMENT

      Latest Features

      Comments on RugbyPass

      N
      NH 25 minutes ago
      'The Wallabies need to convert much better - or Melbourne could be much worse'

      Nice one as always Brett. I think the stats hide a bit of the dominance the lions had, and they would look alot worse in that first half when the game was more in the balance. You mention it here but I think it hasn’t been talked about enough was the lineout. The few times the wallabies managed to exit their half and get an opportunity to attack in the 1st half, the lineout was lost. This was huge in terms of lions keeping momentum and getting another chance to attack, rather than the wallabies getting their chance and to properly ‘exit’ their half. The other one you touch on re “the will jordan bounce of the ball” - is kick chase/receipt. I thought that the wallabies kicked relatively well (although were beaten in this area - Tom L rubbish penalty kicks for touch!), but our kick receipt and chase wasn’t good enough jorgenson try aside. In the 1st half there was a moment where russell kicked for a 50:22 and potter fumbled it into touch after been caught out of position, lynagh makes a similar kick off 1st phase soon after and keenan is good enough to predict the kick, catch it at his bootlaces and put a kick in. That kick happened to go out on the full but it was a demonstration on the difference in positioning etc. This meant that almost every contested kick that was spilled went the way of the lions, thats no accident, that is a better chase, more urgency, more players in the area. Wallabies need to be better in who fields their kicks getting maxy and wright under most of them and Lynagh under less, and the chase needs to be the responsibility of not just one winger but a whole group of players who pressure not just the catch but the tackle, ruck and following phase.

      17 Go to comments
      J
      JW 41 minutes ago
      Competing interests and rotated squads: What the 'player welfare summer' is really telling us

      Thanks for the further background to player welfare metrics Nick.


      Back on the last article I noted that WR is now dedicating a whole section in their six-point business plan to this topic. It also noted that studies indicated 85-90% of workload falls outside of playing. So in respect to your point on the classification of ‘involvements’ included even subs with a low volume of minutes, it actually goes further, to the wider group of players that train as if they’re going to be required to start on the weekend, even if they’re outside the 23. That makes even the 30-35 game borderline pale into insignificance.


      No doubt it is won of the main reasons why France has a quota on the number of one clubs players in their International camps, and rotate in other clubs players through the week. The number of ‘invisible’ games against a player suggests the FFRs 25 game limit as more appropriate?


      So if we take it at face value that Galthie and the FFR have got it right, only a dozen players from the last 60 international caps should have gone on this tour. More players from the ‘Scotland 23’ than the more recent 23.


      The only real pertinent question is what do players prefer more, health or money? There are lots of ethical decisions, like for instance whether France could make a market like Australia’s where their biggest rugby codes have yearly broadcast deals of 360 and 225 million euros. They do it by having a 7/8 month season.

      68 Go to comments
      TRENDING
      TRENDING John Barclay makes concerning Owen Farrell observation despite Test spot calls Barclay makes concerning Farrell observation despite Test spot calls