Why Boks had the World Cup final won as early as the pre-game coin toss
Former Springboks attack coach Swys de Bruin has provided a unique perspective on the coin toss ahead of last Saturday’s World Cup final, claiming it had a huge impact on a match South Africa went on to win 32-12 against England.
In what looks to be a fairly innocuous encounter between captains Siya Kolisi and Owen Farrell with referee Jerome Garces, de Bruin explains how Kolisi dominated that situation through his body language. This is what he said:
While some may not read into this too much, de Bruin emphasised how important this was. He also explained how Kolisi had changed the way that he conducts himself over the past few months.
The 59-year-old de Bruin left his post with the Springboks in August due to personal reasons, but he knows the players well and this makes his analysis interesting.
What is most significant is that this pre-game meeting between the captains was in essence a microcosm of how the final panned out, as South Africa physically dominated England from the very first minute.
A number of excuses have been laid out for England in the wake of their 20-point loss, namely that their bus arrived half an hour late to the stadium and that it was hard to replicate the intensity that they showed against the All Blacks the week before.
Ultimately, Eddie Jones’ side looked a shell of the team that stunned the world with their sublime performance against the reigning champions in the semi-final.
They were ravaged at the scrum and found it almost impossible to penetrate the Springboks defence. In the end, it resulted in a comfortable win for Rassie Erasmus’ side.
What happened at the coin toss may just be Farrell’s style - and there is indeed a chance that some footage can be overanalysed, but there is no doubt that Kolisi’s conduct embodied South Africa’s dominant performance in Yokohama.
WATCH: Siya Kolisi and Rassie Erasmus talk with the media after South Africa's arrival home with the World Cup
Latest Comments
Nah, that just needs some more variation. Chip kicks, grubber stabs, all those. Will Jordan showed a pretty good reason why the rush was bad for his link up with BB.
If you have an overlap on a rush defense, they naturally cover out and out and leave a huge gap near the ruck.
It also helps if both teams play the same rules. ARs set the offside line 1m past where the last mans feet were😅
Go to commentsYeah nar, should work for sure. I was just asking why would you do it that way?
It could be achieved by outsourcing all your IP and players to New Zealand, Japan, and America, with a big Super competition between those countries raking it in with all of Australia's best talent to help them at a club level. When there is enough of a following and players coming through internally, and from other international countries (starting out like Australia/without a pro scene), for these high profile clubs to compete without a heavy australian base, then RA could use all the money they'd saved over the decades to turn things around at home and fund 4 super sides of their own that would be good enough to compete.
That sounds like a great model to reset the game in Aus. Take a couple of decades to invest in youth and community networks before trying to become professional again. I just suggest most aussies would be a bit more optimistic they can make it work without the two decades without any pro club rugby bit.
Go to comments