Why England prop Mako Vunipola wouldn't jump at the chance to play for Tonga
England loosehead Mako Vunipola has stated he would turn down the opportunity to play for Tonga if eligibility rules were changed to enable tier one players to finish out their careers playing for the island of their birth.
A huge focus has been placed on rugby in the Pacific this week following the release of Oceans Apart: Greed, Betrayal and Pacific Island Rugby, a documentary that highlights the exploitation of players from Fiji, Samoa and the Pacific Islands.
Produced by former Samoa forward Dan Leo, the CEO of Pacific Rugby Players Welfare, it highlights a number of issues including the plundering by richer nations of the Islands’ vast playing resources and their reluctance to tour those countries or share gate receipts from home games.
World Rugby chairman Bill Beaumont has proposed that players from Pacific Islands should be permitted to represent their nation of birth once ‘captured’ by tier-one heavyweights as a way to help redress the balance.
But Vunipola, who has Tongan heritage, sees Beaumont’s idea as an imperfect solution.
“I’d love to say yes to that, but it’s difficult also because it would be unfair to those back on the island, to see myself being an old man coming in and taking that opportunity away from them,” said the 29-year-old Vunipola who has 61 England caps.
“As a Tongan, all I want really for the Islanders is a better opportunity for all of them and a better life. If that means I can help with that then I’ll try my best.
“There’s a lot of people like myself who go overseas to try and find a better life and provide for people back home so you can’t take that away from them, that opportunity of playing for someone else, representing a different country.
“But I also feel for those who need an opportunity just to get themselves on to the international stage and getting themselves a better chance. It’s a catch-22 really.”
Latest Comments
Agree with Wilson B- at best. And that is down to skilled individual players who know how to play the game - not a cohesive squad who know their roles and game plan. For those who claim that takes time to develop, the process is to keep the game plan simple at first and add layers as the squad gels and settles in to the new systems. Lack of progress against the rush D, lack of penetration and innovation in the mid-field, basic skill errors and loose forwards coming second in most big games all still evident in game 14 of the season. Hard to see significant measureable progress.
Go to commentsKeep telling yourself that. The time for a fresh broom is at the beginning - not some "balanced, incremental" (i.e. status quo) transition. All teams establish the way forward at the beginning. This coaching group lacked ideas and courage and the players showed it on the pitch. Backs are only average. Forwards are unbalanced and show good set piece but no domination in traditional AB open play. Unfortunately, Foster - Mark 2. You may be happy with those performances and have some belief in some "cunning plan" but I don't see any evidence of it. Rassie is miles ahead and increasing the gap.
Go to comments