1
Why Israel Folau refused chance to save career
By Online Editors
Controversial Wallabies and Waratahs star Israel Folau spurned the chance to save his $4 million contract with Rugby Australia during his code of conduct hearing in Sydney over the last week.
Folau, who is under fire for condemning all gays to "hell" unless they repent for their "sins", has instead reached out to fellow rugby players, particularly those of Pasifika heritage, in search of support for both him and his religious views.
The 30-year-old was told that if he took down his divisive Instagram post, which also claimed that 'drunks, idolators and adulterers' and others would join homosexuals in "hell", it would be viewed as remorseful, according to The Daily Telegraph.
It is believed such an admission of his remorse would have reduced his code of conduct breach to a low or mid-range breach.
However, Folau has been issued with a high-level breach, which is serious enough for Rugby Australia to warrant a termination of his contract, while the post remains on his Instagram account, which has 354,000 followers.
"might as well sack me and all the other Pacific Islands rugby players around the world because we have the same Christian beliefs. I will never apologise for my faith and what I believe in, religion had [sic] got nothing to do with rugby anyways #TYJ".
Elsewhere, many players and significant figures within the rugby fraternity have condemned Folau's sentiments, with players and ex-players such as Gareth Thomas, James Haskell, Joe Marler, TJ Perenara, Brad Weber, Nehe Milner-Skudder and, more recently, Clyde Rathbone all taking aim at the 73-test star.
Following his guilty verdict, the best punishment Folau can now hope for is a suspension and/or a fine.
If he is to be sacked, however, he will be the first Australian athlete to be dismissed for his religious beliefs.
Should that be the case, he would not receive a payout after he declined a $1 million settlement agreement with Rugby Australia to walk away from his contract.
Both Folau and Rugby Australia will give written submissions to the panel before the sanction is handed down, while Folau also has 72 hours to lodge an appeal, a matter of which would be heard by an all-new panel.
The current panel's decision of finding Folau guilty of a high-level breach may not be finalised for several days, with no timeline established on when that will occur.
In other news:
Trending on RugbyPass
2
All Blacks XV player ratings vs Munster
3
Suaalii strikes awe as Wallabies lose midfielder
4
Scott Robertson responds about handling errors
5
Latest Comments
The New Zealand performance in the return fixture in 2016 was filthy. A lot of Irish supporters were pretty shocked by it, viewed it as de facto cheating just to avoid another defeat.
Also shocked by the abuse to Ireland, captain, vice-captain and spectators after the full time whistle in Paris defeat, last match.
Sledging is sledging, but that happens during the game and targetting spectators should be completely out of bounds.
The Irish public used to enjoy these matches, even in defeat. Now they are necessary but unpleasant, because NZ apparently cannot accept or respect successful challengers.
Go to commentsThanks for the analysis Nick, thought provoking as usual. Couple of queries though, in the pic where you've circled Williams bind , I'm pretty sure it shows Stuart's knee on the ground, surely that's a NZ penalty? Also having had the chance to watch it again the All Black scrum seeems to improve after halftime, but before either England or the All Blacks replace their props. Not sure if that was the result of Tuipolutu coming on or some halftime tips. Either way this is only Williams second international season, so he'll be better for the experience.
Go to comments