Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

World Rugby officially appeal Owen Farrell disciplinary decision

Owen Farrell, the England World Cup captain, faces the media during the England rugby World Cup squad announcement at Twickenham Stadium on August 07, 2023 in London, England. (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

World Rugby have officially appealed the decision to downgrade Owen Farrell’s red card following a Six Nations disciplinary hearing held on Tuesday.

ADVERTISEMENT

During England’s 19-17 victory over Wales at Twickenham, the England fly-half received a yellow card for a shoulder-to-head tackle on Taine Basham, which was later upgraded to red following a TMO bunker review.

This then led to a 3.5-hour video hearing on Tuesday where an anticipated six-match ban, possibly ruling him out of the World Cup opener against Argentina, was impending.

Video Spacer
Video Spacer

However, despite past suspensions for similar incidents, he was cleared by an all-Australian judicial committee that ruled the tackle deserved only a yellow card, disputing the bunker’s red decision upgrade.

The verdict considered England hooker Jamie George’s attempted tackle on Basham, asserting it caused the Welshman to alter direction before Farrell’s challenge and influenced the outcome.

Related

The decision was met with widespread criticism, much of it levelled at World Rugby despite the hearing falling under Six Nations’ oversight and not the sport’s governing body. Now World Rugby have officially appealed the decision.

A statement read: “World Rugby has today [Thursday] confirmed to the Rugby Football Union and Six Nations Rugby that it will exercise its right to appeal in regard to the Owen Farrell disciplinary decision following a careful review of the independent judicial committee’s full written decision received on August 16.

ADVERTISEMENT

“World Rugby fully supports the important role that an independent disciplinary process plays in upholding the integrity and values of the sport, particularly regarding foul play involving head contact.

“Player welfare is the sport’s number one priority, and the head contact process is central to that mission at the elite level of the sport. Having considered the full written decision, World Rugby considers an appeal to be warranted.

“In line with provisions set out under regulation 17, an independent appeal committee will be appointed to determine the matter at the earliest possible opportunity.

“Further details regarding the hearing, including appointments and date, will be confirmed by Six Nations Rugby.”

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video

South Africa vs Black Ferns XV | Women's International | Full Match Replay

Play Video

Namibia vs United Arab Emirates | Asia/Africa Rugby World Cup Play-off | Full Match Replay

Play Video

Lions Share | Episode 5

Play Video

Classic Wallabies vs British & Irish Legends | First Match | Full Match Replay

Play Video

Did the Lions loosies get away with murder? And revisiting the Springboks lift | Whistle Watch

Play Video

The First Test, Visiting The Great Barrier Reef & Poetry with Pierre | Ep 6: The Ultimate Test

Play Video

KOKO Show | July 22nd | Full Throttle with Brisbane Test Review and Melbourne Preview

Play Video

New Zealand v South Africa | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

25 Comments
a
andrew 711 days ago

Andrew

This reversal of the red makes a mockery of all the good efforts being made to make the game safer. It's a red for sure and World Rugby needs to set an example here.

S
Stephen 712 days ago

Been getting away with it to long see why he's called shoulder boy he thinks he's untouchable

C
ColinK 712 days ago

Only someone who has never tackled someone would think that was not an intentional shoulder shot aimed at the upper body, and quite possibly the head. Farrell has a history of it frankly if Moala got 10 weeks so should he or more. This BS from him should stop and he must be punished for the judicial process to have any cred.

S
Schneider 713 days ago

Well, all the dithering about Ref decisions and interpretations for the past few years was supposed to be sorted by the Bunker System. Now look - farcical joke of a citting committee , a knee jerk appeal, the wider rugby community scratching its head. Well Done World Rugby- only you could have pulled of this mess!

J
Juan Jose 713 days ago

The problem now is that whichever outcome it will be a mess: Give him (correctly) 6 weeks? The rugby board succumbed to social media pressure! Keep things as now? Is a joke showing how rugby board is bent towards RFU.

Not to mention that anyhow the bunker credibility is gone.

The damage is done.

N
Northandsouth 712 days ago

The bunker did nothing wrong. The ref said minimum yellow - refer to bunker (correct). The bunker said worthy of upgrade to red (correct), the judicial panel said mitigating movement and downgrade (not correct) and World Rugby said that is a bunch of old cobblers we're appealing (correct). This isn't a start to finish farce, its one bad judicial decision in amongst a series of sensible actions and actors. If the appeal succeeds the system has worked, albeit I agree its a bad look for the sport generally.

d
dk 713 days ago

Let's hope the review panel consists of a Tongan, a Samoan and a South African. People who understand that when you land a head shot, you know you're going to get serious time.

P
Piet 713 days ago

Very few players actually intend to inflick serious injury to other players. This is about stamping out dangerous play and if the IRB is serious about it this ruling should be overturned-or are they going to allow all future rulings to refer back to this one. Then forget about cleaning out rigby and lets see who can get the smartest lawayer. Farrel should know by now that you cannot tackle or prepare for a tackle in the upright position- the risk is too high. Look at his record-he is a dangerous player and steps should be taken to make him change the way he plays the game- the same as for everybody else

A
AD 713 days ago

Good. Give him a 6 week ban. That's fair.

M
Mark 713 days ago

This is beyond farcical now.

There comes a point where the attention and narrative surrounding an individual starts to overshadow the team as a whole.

This whole charade is sucking any/all of the positive energy from the England camp.

It's a shambles.

d
dk 713 days ago

He brings the narrative upon himself with his serial head hunting and Teflon treatment. If A, he didn't do it or B, he wasn't given the Teflon treatment and exonerated, we wouldn't be talking about it. Pretty simple.

J
Juan Jose 713 days ago

simple: leave Farrell home. Decide it as RFU, citing he is a liability. It doesn't take much.

R
RS 713 days ago

True, but Farrel to blame for all of this.

S
Sumkunn Tsadmiova 713 days ago

Important to remember this is an appeal against the original decision NOT a retrial. So, for the appeal to stand, the appellants must show clear negligence and fault by the disciplinary panel in their original decision.

M
Mw 713 days ago

That'll be simple to prove as the Welsh player never changes direction.

M
Mark 713 days ago

Let's face it, world rugby has simply chosen to march in step with the current social media narrative surrounding the original decision.

Like many large organisations, companies and indeed gvts it has seen in which direction the social media wind is blowing and set sail accordingly.

G
GrahamVF 713 days ago

This is not subject to criminal or civil court procedures. The appeal only has to show balance of probability to succeed. The relevant rule is Section 20.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

LONG READ
LONG READ ‘Lions tours are wonderfully uplifting but the trail of hard luck stories is long and painful' ‘Lions tours are wonderfully uplifting but the trail of hard luck stories is long and painful'