World Rugby to push through all 12 Trial Laws into full time use
The World Rugby Council has unanimously decided to adopt into law the complete package of 12 law amendments that are currently under global trial.
Approval follows a recommendation by the Rugby Committee after a comprehensive evaluation of trial performance from playing, coaching, match officiating, fan and player welfare perspectives by the specialist 15s Laws Review Group (LRG).
With the global law trials having operated since August in the northern hemisphere and January in the southern hemisphere, there is no material on-field impact and amendments will be codified within law immediate effect.
Continue reading below...
In short, the law amendments that have been adopted into law are:
Uncontested scrums must have eight players (Law 3.15)
Permit kick to touch after time has elapsed (Law 5.7c)
Where multiple penalty infringements the non-offending team can choose the most advantageous (Law 7.2d)
Penalty try has no conversion (Law 8.1c, 8.3 and 8.7)
Touch, 22m and in goal simplification (Law 18)
Scrum – no signal from ref (Law 19.22)
Scrum – alignment of scrum-half (Law 19.15f)
Scrum – compulsory strike (LRG insist that for player welfare purposes this is a compulsory strike by the hooker (Law 19.22)
Scrum - Allow number eight to pick up from second row of scrum (Law 19.36c)
Tackler must get up before playing the ball and then can only play from their side of the tackle gate (Law 14.6)
Change in pre-ruck offside line formation – at least one player on their feet and over the ball which is on the ground (Law 14.11)
No kicking out of ruck (Law 15.16c)
World Rugby Chairman Bill Beaumont said: "World Rugby continually reviews the laws to ensure that the game is as enjoyable, simple and safe as possible at all levels. I would like to thank our unions for their full support throughout the process, the experts who evaluated the global trial data and the wider global community for their feedback via our social media survey. These views are important and the response was overwhelmingly positive."
Rugby Committee Chairman John Jeffrey added: "These law amendments are designed to improve the experience of those playing, officiating and watching the game at all levels and the feedback from the global rugby community confirms that the trials have been positive and effective. Adoption into law is the culmination of a four-year process that began with 140 union submissions and has involved superb input from players, coaches, referees, medics and administrators. It has been truly collaborative, and we look forward to seeing these amendments embedded within law as we head towards Rugby World Cup 2019 in Japan."
Latest Comments
There is no place to hide in the front row. You win or lose each time and it selects for hard men/women and those who enjoy combat
Go to commentsThey might have won several different areas on the field but the one that ultimately counts is on the scoreboard. Ben Smith’s nonsense is still shown up for what it is following criticisings by his team’s coach claiming similar nonsenses and several other players as well. I am not an expert but I know All Blacks know that the game is won by the team with more points on the board than the opposition. Also the red card on Sam Cane is entirely his own fault. If they were aggrieved for having one less player on the pitch, that was their own fault, their own captain who possibly in a moment of forgetfulness tackled too high but either way it is a RWC Final, you cannot be having lapses of forgetfulness in a match like that. The fact that they were down a man for 64 minutes was their fault. And even if they did dominate the second half for 35 minutes, they had crossed the whitewash twice, they had several kicks at goal, the fact is they didn't maximize on all the opportunities they were given. The one try was disallowed, the two kicks at goal were missed, the opportunities not taken. Every tackle was made by the Springboks with so much more fervour than anyone had seen even in the Semi Final the week previously. Whatever Ben Smith says, most of what he says can be chalked down to a spoiled sport who has nothing better to say than whine and moan because ultimately the team he supports lost when it mattered most.
Go to comments