Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

World Rugby seriously weighing up reducing replacements

Photo by Dan Mullan/Getty Images)

The revolution sweeping through rugby could include a reduction in the number of replacements allowed during a match.

ADVERTISEMENT

As the southern hemisphere countries contemplate major changes to the competition structures, World Rugby is turning its sights to the replacement rule.

A number of leading figures in the game, including England coach Eddie Jones, are advocating for the change so as to introduce more fatigue into the game.

Video Spacer

Is Jordie now the best Barrett of them all? | Sam Smith Reports – Hurricanes v Blues

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 5:55
Loaded: 0.00%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 5:55
 
1x
    • Chapters
    • descriptions off, selected
    • captions off, selected
    • en (Main), selected
    Video Spacer

    Is Jordie now the best Barrett of them all? | Sam Smith Reports – Hurricanes v Blues

    This, in turn, would open up attacking opportunities. A reduced number of replacements would mean fewer interruptions to matches, and there is also a belief in some quarters that the current rule leads to more injuries.

    The Telegraph has reported World Rugby is sifting through data from major leagues including Super Rugby as it contemplates making the change.

    https://www.instagram.com/p/CCx6zCcAoot/

    At the moment, eight replacements are allowed for each side and Jones believes this should be cut by two.

    “We have got to get some fatigue back into the game, we have got to get some space back into the game because otherwise we will end up with NFL,” he said this week.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    “I would put the game down to six replacements and the referees less communicating about decisions and get on with the game. And I think we have got to find out some way to tidy up the TMO (video ref).”

    Former England hooker Brian Moore is among those saying a cut will improve safety. The current rule meant that too many big and fresh players were charging into the game against tired opponents.

    Another former England player, Jeremy Guscott, and top referee Nigel Owens are also backing the change.

    World Rugby’s chief medical officer Dr Éanna Falvey said the world body was trying to use good data rather than emotion to base decisions on.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    He said teams would still need three specialist frontrowers on the bench for scrum safety reasons.

    “It limits your options, basically,” he said.

    “The real issue is whether or not you are prepared to cut down on replacements and having to play without specialist position players like a nine or a 10, because you might need to have a utility back.

    “Our first step with this is to know whether reducing substitutions makes a big difference to the injury rate and pace of the game, and if it does, to start looking at the practical solutions to that problem.”

    He said a rule change could also lead to body shape changes.

    “…bigger players may need to play for 80 minutes rather than 55, which means a player can’t necessarily be 10kg heavier because he won’t be able to get around for the final 20 minutes,” he said.

    “The downside is that it may promote more injuries in those players while they are adapting and getting up to speed. But the upside would be that you have lighter players who are more mobile, and able to get around more.

    “The argument would be that if you have players who are not quite as explosive, you might see a cut down in the number of injuries.

    “But, the reason we have substitutions in the first place is to prevent injuries. It’s difficult to know where the trade-off is with this.”

    ADVERTISEMENT
    LIVE

    Chile vs Brazil | Men's International

    Classic Wallabies vs British & Irish Legends | First Match | Full Match Replay

    Did the Lions loosies get away with murder? And revisiting the Springboks lift | Whistle Watch

    The First Test, Visiting The Great Barrier Reef & Poetry with Pierre | Ep 6: The Ultimate Test

    KOKO Show | July 22nd | Full Throttle with Brisbane Test Review and Melbourne Preview

    New Zealand v South Africa | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

    USA vs England | Men's International | Full Match Replay

    France v Argentina | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

    Lions Share | Episode 4

    Trending on RugbyPass

    Comments

    0 Comments
    Be the first to comment...

    Join free and tell us what you really think!

    Sign up for free
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Latest Features

    Comments on RugbyPass

    F
    Flankly 24 minutes ago
    Maro Itoje: What was said as Lions fell 'far behind' on scoreboard

    This is what dreams are made of

    Umm. Credit to a winning team, but to be clear … the team you beat is ranked 6th in the world, did not make it out of the pool stage of the last RWC, and came last in the 2024 Rugby Championship. Not sure any bookie has them as favorites for the 2025 RC either.


    Australia have made progress for sure, and of course that matters. But for a team made up of 4 leading rugby nations, including two that are ranked much higher than this opposition, a win is expected and a loss would be humiliating. Furthermore, with weeks of playing together, planning together and living together it is hard to argue that the Lions have had less opportunity for cohesion than Australia.


    A win is a win, and no-one should question that. But a last-minute one-score win that depended on a 50/50 penalty call is one to humbly accept, rather than to crow about. It was neither a beating, nor even a compelling win. I thought win was not undeserved, but it’s a close call on which was the better team on the day.


    And let’s get off this nonsense about it being like a world cup final. The local pub teams may feel that their big game is like a world cup final, but it’s stupid to pretend it is the reality. The RWC final is played by two of the top teams in the world, and there is no evidence that either of these teams fits that description. There is a game in Eden Park later this year between the #1 and #2 ranked teams that would be a lot closer to it, of course.


    Well done to the Lions, and congrats to the Wallabies. Let’s enjoy a good game for what it was, without pretending it was something bigger than it was.

    1 Go to comments
    TRENDING
    TRENDING Joe Schmidt reacts to Owen Farrell's Lions selection to face Wallabies Joe Schmidt reacts to Owen Farrell's Lions selection to face Wallabies