Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'You have to start him again next week': Marcus Smith not to blame for England woes

Marcus Smith of England look on during the Guinness Six Nations Rugby match between England and France at Twickenham Stadium on March 11, 2023 in London, England. (Photo by Ryan Pierse/Getty Images)

Marcus Smith was handed a start by new head coach Steve Borthwick in place of Owen Farrell but Irish pundits have avoided laying blame on the Harlequins flyhalf.

ADVERTISEMENT

Smith returned to the Premiership during the Six Nations bye week to get some minutes under his belt after featuring in short spurts off the bench for England since his first up start against Scotland.

After Smith starred in a brilliant performance against Exeter, Borthwick boldly elevated him back into the starting line-up to play France at Farrell’s expense, who led the side to two victories over Italy and Wales.

Video Spacer
Video Spacer

After the 53-10 defeat to France, former Scotland head coach Matt Williams was reluctant to put blame on Smith’s shoulders with so many other areas of concern for England.

“You certainly can’t look at Marcus and say he was poor,” Williams said on Virgin Media Sport‘s post-game panel.

“I thought the No 9 who started, Jack van Poortvliet was as slow as a month of Sundays.

“He was taking an age to get the ball from the ruck to Smith, and that takes away his space.

“To even think about 9 and 10 is wrong. The 9 was slow, I will say that, he is not international standard in my opinion.

“They’ve got a real problem at 9 but there was so many other problems around the field.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Apart from the slow service from the scrumhalf, Williams said England’s loose forwards were ‘wiped off the park’ by the French trio of Gregory Alldritt, Charles Ollivon and Francois Cros.

The brutal French pack caused problems for England at the scrum and at the ruck where the home side were penalised for a number of infringements.

“The back row, as Andrew said, were just wiped off the park. The scrum was struggling, the breakdown was struggling. They were struggling in the backfield with the kicking game.

“Their defensive system was poor. They were missing tackles, they were getting around them left, right and centre, through them.

ADVERTISEMENT

“And what about the 10? Let’s not blame the young man. There are multiple problems before we get to Smith.

“I thought he was competent but he is not even a story in that game.”

Ireland’s fullback Rob Kearney was impressed with the cameo from Farrell which gave England a short burst but ultimately backed Smith to retain the job for the next clash with Ireland.

He did not think it was a good idea to take the 10 jersey off Smith after just one opportunity to start.

“I was only just thinking does Farrell come back in next week,” Kearney said.

“For me when Farrell and Mitchell came on for that first immediate 10 minutes, there was a difference in England’s play.

“The pace was up, the energy was up, and then it tapered off a little bit.

“I said before the game that Farrell would always be in my starting XV, but as a head coach you’ve given a young kid his start.

“Is it the right thing now to take it back off him? If you want to really try and develop him and give him every opportunity to grow.

“I think you have to start him again next week.”

Related

Williams believed that Smith could flourish at international level if he was in the right system.

So far Smith has tried to fit alongside Farrell at 12 for most of his short international career with the start against France a rare opportunity to pull the strings by himself.

“The problem is the structure around him. If you put Smith in Ireland’s structure, he’d go brilliantly,” he said.

“The structure around the 10 has options, and we’ll see that tomorrow hopefully as we have all year with Johnny [Sexton].

“But he [Smith] hasn’t got those options, he hasn’t got that structure around him.

“When Mitchell came on, there was certainly a lot more spark, he was getting the ball faster and Farrell was calling more shots, there is no two ways about that.

“It looked better for a couple of minutes, but then it fell apart. That tells you there is whole lot of other problems.

“I think if you threw Marcus Smith out now that would be the worst possible thing you could do to the young man.”

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Toshiba Brave Lupus Tokyo vs Kubota Spears | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 Final | Full Match Replay

Saitama Wild Knights vs Kobe Steelers | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 Bronze Final | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 42 | Investec Champions Cup Final Review

Spain's Incredible Rugby Sevens Journey to the World Championship Final | HSBC SVNS Embedded | Episode 14

Australia vs USA | Pacific Four Series 2025 | Full Match Replay

New Zealand vs Canada | Pacific Four Series 2025 | Full Match Replay

South Africa vs New Zealand | The Rugby Championship U20's | Full Match Replay

The Game that Made Jonah Lomu

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

10 Comments
l
lot 816 days ago

Blame the COACH and RFU. this is his team and his game plan. Record loss , Great job Sacking Eddie JOnes. WEll done and Congrats. did not take long. 🤣

f
fl 816 days ago

People keep treating Marcus Smith like he's the main character of rugby. Every article about him emphasises how young he is, and how we don't want to knock his confidence and how we need to help him grow as a player - but the same treatment is never extended to Jack van Poortvliet. JVP is three years younger than Smith, and is performing much better than Smith was at that age.

B
BigMaul 811 days ago

The media always focus on the 10. But I’m not sure why you’re getting worked up about it? Just sounds a bit bitter. It’s good for JVP that he can go somewhat under the radar. It allows him to bed in without any distraction.


Also, I’m not sure why you feel the need to compare JVP and Smith. But I don’t think it’s accurate to say he is performing much better than Smith at that age. Different positions, so it’s hard to compare, but there’s only 2 years and 3 months between them, and 2 years ago Smith had been 1st choice at his club for 4 years and led Quins to the premiership title that season. He was phenomenal.


JVP is a great talent, but he’s not had that kind of impact yet in his pro career.

T
Taff 816 days ago

I agree, Smith was not to blame and Farrell was not the answer when he came on. I would drop Steward from team and put Watson at 15, get some pace in backs. JVP was rubbish, Mitchel wasn’t much better, but get some pace and power in forwards asap or Ireland will have a field day.

f
fl 816 days ago

WE sHoulD drop sTeWard from TEaM and pUt wAtson aT 15

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tommy B. 32 minutes ago
Rassie Erasmus wades into heated debate over Jaden Hendrikse antics

🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂

I’ll go with one more because it’s so funny but then I must stop. There’s only so long you can talk to the nutter on the bus.

There is no legal impediment in the GFA to ANY form of border. It’s mentioned very briefly and ambiguously but even then there’s a caveat ‘if the security situation permits’ which is decided by the British government as the border is an internationally, UN recognised formal border between sovereign states. Now, you can argue that this is because it was assumed it would always be in the EU context - but we all know the issue with ‘assumption’. As to your hilarious drivel about what you think is in the GFA, you clearly haven’t read it or at best not understood it. There are still 1,580 British Army troops in NI. The legal status of NI as part of the UK is unchanged.

So, there was a problem for those that wanted to use the border to complicate any future British government changing regulations and trade arrangements through domestic legislation. Hence ‘hard border’ became ANYTHING that wasn’t a totally open border.

This allowed the EU and their fanatical Remainer British counterparts to imply that any form of administration AT the border was a ‘hard border.’ Soldiers with machine guns? Hard border. Old bloke with clipboard checking the load of every 200th lorry? Hard border. Anything in between? Hard Border. They could then use Gerry’s implicit threats to any ‘border officials’ to ensure that there would be an unique arrangement so that if any future parliament tried to change trade or administrative regulations for any part of the UK (which the EU was very worried about) some fanatical Remainer MP could stand up and say - ‘this complicates the situation in NI.’

You’ve just had a free lesson in the complex politics that went WAY over your head at the time. You’re welcome.

Now, I must slowly back out of the room, and bid you good day, as you’re clearly a nutter.

584 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING All Blacks trio return for Crusaders' Qualifying Final against Reds All Blacks trio return for Crusaders' playoff push
Search